Centre for Workers’ Management end line report - MFS II country evaluations, Civil Society component

D.C. Klaver, S. Wadhwa, R. Pandey, A. Madaan, B. Prasad Mohapatra

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

Abstract

This report describes the findings of the end line assessment of the Centre for Workers’ Management (CWM) in India, which is a partner of Hivos. It assesses CWM’s contribution towards strengthening Civil Society in India whilst using the CIVICUS analytical framework. It is a follow-up of a baseline study conducted in 2012. Key questions that are being answered comprise changes in the five CIVICUS dimensions to which CWM contributed; the nature of its contribution; the relevance of the contribution made and an identification of factors that explain CWM’s role in civil society strengthening. The evaluation was commissioned by NWO-WOTRO, the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research in the Netherlands and is part of the programmatic evaluation of the Co-Financing System - MFS II financed by the Dutch Government, whose overall aim is to strengthen civil society in the South as a building block for structural poverty reduction. Apart from assessing impact on MDGs, the evaluation also assesses the contribution of the Dutch Co-Funding Agencies to strengthen the capacities of their Southern Partners, as well as the contribution of these partners towards building a vibrant civil society arena.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationWageningen
PublisherCentre for Development Innovation, Wageningen UR
Number of pages78
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameReport / Wageningen UR, Centre for Development Innovation
PublisherCentre for Development Innovation, Wageningen UR
No.CDI-15-034

Keywords

  • civil society
  • society
  • empowerment
  • development projects
  • india
  • south asia
  • asia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Centre for Workers’ Management end line report - MFS II country evaluations, Civil Society component'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this