Can zoning resolve nature use conflicts? The case of the Numto Nature Park in the Russian Arctic

A.O. Pristupa*, M. Tysyachnyouk, A.P.J. Mol, H.B.J. Leemans, Tatiana Minayeva, Anastasia Markina

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the Russian Arctic, nature protection is important to preserve valuable ecosystems and indigenous lifestyles against the rapidly expanding oil and gas activities. In this regard, zoning legitimately balances influential stakeholders versus weak ones, and can leverage stakeholders to exercise their rights. This study explores how various stakeholders employ zoning in the Numto Nature Park in the oil-rich Russian Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug–Yugra to advance their interests and how they use scientific information to achieve this. Through stakeholder interviews, analysis of electronic media and literature review, we conclude that a participatory and science-based zoning exercise stimulates the necessary deliberation. However, legal ambiguity, deficient law implementation and informal practices limit the zoning's potential to balance stakeholders’ interests. All the stakeholders calculatingly used scientific information to legitimize their own ambitions, activities and claims. Hence, zoning and the underlying information claims should be interpreted as both a resource and a battleground in nature-use conflicts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1674-1700
JournalJournal of Environmental Planning and Management
Volume61
Issue number10
Early online date18 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Russia
  • protected areas
  • zoning
  • legitimacy
  • information

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can zoning resolve nature use conflicts? The case of the Numto Nature Park in the Russian Arctic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this