Business Conflict and Risk Regulation: Understanding the Influence of the Pesticide Industry

Kees Jansen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the criticism, frequent in the literature, of business influence on the formulation of pesticide risk regulation, there has been remarkably little systematic study of this practice. This article discusses Costa Rica pesticide producers’ business influence on global and national efforts to improve risk regulation. Generic pesticide producers, selling off-patent chemicals, contest the views of traditional, research-based pesticide companies, which demand stricter application of global regulatory guidelines. These business sectors use different forms of power (as identified in neo-Gramscian theory) for bending regulation to their advantage. The argument developed here builds on neopluralist business conflict theory for explaining shifts in environmental governance. It challenges a recently made argument that business conflict increases the state’s ability to issue more restrictive environmental regulation. Instead, to truly understand the outcomes of business conflict–environmental governance interactions and the implementation of global environmental standards, researchers should analyze the structural heterogeneity within states.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-66
JournalGlobal Environmental Politics
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Nov 2017

Keywords

  • pesticide risk
  • business conflict theory
  • Costa Rica
  • global governance
  • intellectual property rights
  • risk regulation
  • data ownership
  • equivalence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Business Conflict and Risk Regulation: Understanding the Influence of the Pesticide Industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this