Bridging uncertainty concepts across narratives and simulations in environmental scenarios

S. Pedde, K. Kok, J. Onigkeit, Calum Brown, Ian Holman, P. Harrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Uncertainties in our understanding of current and future climate change projections, impacts and vulnerabilities are structured by scientists using scenarios, which are generally in qualitative (narrative) and quantitative (numerical) forms. Although conceptually strong, qualitative and quantitative scenarios have limited complementarity due to the lack of a fundamental bridge between two different concepts of uncertainty: linguistic and epistemic. Epistemic uncertainty is represented by the range of scenarios and linguistic variables within them, while linguistic uncertainty is represented by the translation of those linguistic variables via the fuzzy set approach. Both are therefore incorporated in the models that utilise the final quantifications. The application of this method is demonstrated in a stakeholder-led development of socioeconomic scenarios. The socio-economic scenarios include several vague elements due to heterogeneous linguistic interpretations of future change on the part of stakeholders. We apply the so-called ‘Centre of Gravity’ (CoG) operator to defuzzify the quantifications of linguistic values provided by stakeholders. The results suggest that, in these cases, uniform distributions provide a close fit to the membership functions derived from ranges of values provided by stakeholders. As a result, the 90% or 95% intervals of the probability density functions are similar to the 0.1 or 0.05 degrees of membership of the linguistic values of linguistic variables. By bridging different uncertainty concepts (linguistic and epistemic uncertainties), this study offers a substantial step towards linking qualitative and quantitative scenarios.

LanguageEnglish
Pages655-666
JournalRegional Environmental Change
Volume19
Issue number3
Early online date11 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

stakeholder
simulation
complementarity
probability density function
vulnerability
gravity
climate change
socioeconomics

Cite this

Pedde, S. ; Kok, K. ; Onigkeit, J. ; Brown, Calum ; Holman, Ian ; Harrison, P. / Bridging uncertainty concepts across narratives and simulations in environmental scenarios. In: Regional Environmental Change. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 655-666.
@article{296300a4e7254960a636da81443e1a35,
title = "Bridging uncertainty concepts across narratives and simulations in environmental scenarios",
abstract = "Uncertainties in our understanding of current and future climate change projections, impacts and vulnerabilities are structured by scientists using scenarios, which are generally in qualitative (narrative) and quantitative (numerical) forms. Although conceptually strong, qualitative and quantitative scenarios have limited complementarity due to the lack of a fundamental bridge between two different concepts of uncertainty: linguistic and epistemic. Epistemic uncertainty is represented by the range of scenarios and linguistic variables within them, while linguistic uncertainty is represented by the translation of those linguistic variables via the fuzzy set approach. Both are therefore incorporated in the models that utilise the final quantifications. The application of this method is demonstrated in a stakeholder-led development of socioeconomic scenarios. The socio-economic scenarios include several vague elements due to heterogeneous linguistic interpretations of future change on the part of stakeholders. We apply the so-called ‘Centre of Gravity’ (CoG) operator to defuzzify the quantifications of linguistic values provided by stakeholders. The results suggest that, in these cases, uniform distributions provide a close fit to the membership functions derived from ranges of values provided by stakeholders. As a result, the 90{\%} or 95{\%} intervals of the probability density functions are similar to the 0.1 or 0.05 degrees of membership of the linguistic values of linguistic variables. By bridging different uncertainty concepts (linguistic and epistemic uncertainties), this study offers a substantial step towards linking qualitative and quantitative scenarios.",
author = "S. Pedde and K. Kok and J. Onigkeit and Calum Brown and Ian Holman and P. Harrison",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10113-018-1338-2",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "655--666",
journal = "Regional Environmental Change",
issn = "1436-3798",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Bridging uncertainty concepts across narratives and simulations in environmental scenarios. / Pedde, S.; Kok, K.; Onigkeit, J.; Brown, Calum; Holman, Ian; Harrison, P.

In: Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 19, No. 3, 03.2019, p. 655-666.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging uncertainty concepts across narratives and simulations in environmental scenarios

AU - Pedde, S.

AU - Kok, K.

AU - Onigkeit, J.

AU - Brown, Calum

AU - Holman, Ian

AU - Harrison, P.

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Uncertainties in our understanding of current and future climate change projections, impacts and vulnerabilities are structured by scientists using scenarios, which are generally in qualitative (narrative) and quantitative (numerical) forms. Although conceptually strong, qualitative and quantitative scenarios have limited complementarity due to the lack of a fundamental bridge between two different concepts of uncertainty: linguistic and epistemic. Epistemic uncertainty is represented by the range of scenarios and linguistic variables within them, while linguistic uncertainty is represented by the translation of those linguistic variables via the fuzzy set approach. Both are therefore incorporated in the models that utilise the final quantifications. The application of this method is demonstrated in a stakeholder-led development of socioeconomic scenarios. The socio-economic scenarios include several vague elements due to heterogeneous linguistic interpretations of future change on the part of stakeholders. We apply the so-called ‘Centre of Gravity’ (CoG) operator to defuzzify the quantifications of linguistic values provided by stakeholders. The results suggest that, in these cases, uniform distributions provide a close fit to the membership functions derived from ranges of values provided by stakeholders. As a result, the 90% or 95% intervals of the probability density functions are similar to the 0.1 or 0.05 degrees of membership of the linguistic values of linguistic variables. By bridging different uncertainty concepts (linguistic and epistemic uncertainties), this study offers a substantial step towards linking qualitative and quantitative scenarios.

AB - Uncertainties in our understanding of current and future climate change projections, impacts and vulnerabilities are structured by scientists using scenarios, which are generally in qualitative (narrative) and quantitative (numerical) forms. Although conceptually strong, qualitative and quantitative scenarios have limited complementarity due to the lack of a fundamental bridge between two different concepts of uncertainty: linguistic and epistemic. Epistemic uncertainty is represented by the range of scenarios and linguistic variables within them, while linguistic uncertainty is represented by the translation of those linguistic variables via the fuzzy set approach. Both are therefore incorporated in the models that utilise the final quantifications. The application of this method is demonstrated in a stakeholder-led development of socioeconomic scenarios. The socio-economic scenarios include several vague elements due to heterogeneous linguistic interpretations of future change on the part of stakeholders. We apply the so-called ‘Centre of Gravity’ (CoG) operator to defuzzify the quantifications of linguistic values provided by stakeholders. The results suggest that, in these cases, uniform distributions provide a close fit to the membership functions derived from ranges of values provided by stakeholders. As a result, the 90% or 95% intervals of the probability density functions are similar to the 0.1 or 0.05 degrees of membership of the linguistic values of linguistic variables. By bridging different uncertainty concepts (linguistic and epistemic uncertainties), this study offers a substantial step towards linking qualitative and quantitative scenarios.

UR - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1338-2

U2 - 10.1007/s10113-018-1338-2

DO - 10.1007/s10113-018-1338-2

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 655

EP - 666

JO - Regional Environmental Change

T2 - Regional Environmental Change

JF - Regional Environmental Change

SN - 1436-3798

IS - 3

ER -