Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning

P. Opdam, C.C. Vos, R. Foppen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

237 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Landscapes are studied by pattern (the geographical approach) and by process (the ecological approach within landscape ecology). The future of landscape ecology depends on whether the two approaches can be integrated. We present an approach to bridge the gap between the many detailed process studies on species, and applied activities such as landscape evaluation and design, which require integrated knowledge. The approach consists of four components: 1) Empirical case studies of different scales, organisms and processes. 2) Modeling studies to extrapolate empirical studies across space and time. 3) Modeling studies to produce guidelines and standards for landscape conditions. 4) Methods and tools for integration to the landscape level, which can be built into multidisciplinary tools for design and evaluation. We conclude that in the landscape ecological literature, the steps 1 and 2 are well represented, whereas the steps 3 and 4 are mostly neglected. We challenge landscape ecologists to push landscape ecology to a higher level of maturation and to further develop its profile as a problem-oriented science.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)767-779
JournalLandscape Ecology
Volume16
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • application of empirical data
  • dispersal corridors
  • habitat network
  • integration of pattern and process approach
  • landscape planning
  • metapopulation studies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this