Biogeomorphology, quo vadis? On processes, time, and space in biogeomorphology

A. Larsen*, W. Nardin, W.I. Van de Lageweg, N. Bätz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biogeomorphology has been expanding as a discipline, due to increased recognition of the role that biology can play in geomorphic processes, as well as due to our increasing capacity to measure and quantify feedbacks between biological and geomorphological systems. Here, we provide an overview of the growth and status of biogeomorphology. This overview also provides the context for introducing this special issue on biogeomorphology, and specifically examines the thematic domains of biogeomorphological research, methods used, open questions and conundrums, problems encountered, future research directions, and practical applications in management and policy (e.g. Nature based solutions). We find that whilst biogeomorphological studies have a long history, there remain many new and surprising biogeomorphic processes and feedbacks that are only now being identified and quantified. Based on the current state of knowledge, we suggest that linking ecological and geomorphic processes across different spatio‐temporal scales emerges as the main research challenge in biogeomorphology, as well as the translation of biogeomorphic knowledge into management approaches to environmental systems. We recommend that future biogeomorphic studies should help to contextualise environmental feedbacks by including the spatio‐temporal scales relevant to the organism(s) under investigation, using knowledge of their ecology and size (or metabolic rate). Furthermore, in order to sufficiently understand the ‘engineering’ capacity of organisms, we recommend studying at least the time period bounded by two disturbance events, and recommend to also investigate the geomorphic work done during disturbance events, in order to put estimates of engineering capacity of biota into a wider perspective. Finally, the future seems bright, as increasingly inter‐disciplinary and longer‐term monitoring are coming to fruition, and we can expect important advances in process understanding across scales and better informed modelling efforts
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-23
JournalEarth Surface Processes and Landforms
Volume46
Issue number1
Early online date10 Oct 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021

Keywords

  • biogeomorphology
  • biology
  • ecogeomorphology
  • ecology
  • geomorphology
  • management and policy
  • nature-based solutions
  • numerical modelling
  • physical modelling
  • processes
  • space
  • time

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biogeomorphology, quo vadis? On processes, time, and space in biogeomorphology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this