Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model: Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession

U. Sommer; R. Adrian; L.D. Domis; J.J. Elser; U. Gaedke; B. Ibelings; E. Jeppesen; M.F.L.L.W. Lürling; J.C. Molinero; W.M. Mooij; E. van Donk; M. Winder

doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251

Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model: Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession

U. Sommer, R. Adrian, L.D. Domis, J.J. Elser, U. Gaedke, B. Ibelings, E. Jeppesen, M.F.L.L.W. Lürling, J.C. Molinero, W.M. Mooij, E. van Donk, M. Winder

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

479 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

UV/H2O2 treatment can be part of the process converting surface water to drinking water, but would pose a potential problem when resulting in genotoxicity. This study investigates the genotoxicity of samples collected from the water treatment plant Andijk, applying UV/H2O2 treatment with an electrical energy dose of 0.54 kWh/m(3) and a H2O2 dose of 6 mg/l. Genotoxicity was tested in vitro using the Ames and Comet assay. All samples showed negative results. Samples were also tested in in vivo genotoxicity tests in Eastern mudminnow fish (Umbra pygmaea) by a sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and a Comet assay. No significant increases in SCEs were observed, but gill cells isolated from fish exposed to water obtained immediately after UV/H2O2 treatment and to Lake IJsselmeer water showed significantly increased DNA damage in the Comet assay. All other samples tested negative in this Comet assay. This indicates that DNA damaging compounds may result from the UV/H2O2 treatment, but also that these can be efficiently eliminated upon granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment of the water. It is concluded that when combined with this subsequent GAC treatment, UV/H2O2 treatment for the production of drinking water from surface water is not of concern with respect to genotoxicity.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	429-448
Journal	Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
Volume	43
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251
Publication status	Published - 2012

Keywords

phytoplankton spring bloom
fresh-water phytoplankton
critical depth hypothesis
clear-water
long-term
lake constance
climate-change
population-dynamics
food quality
deep lake

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251

Cite this

Sommer, U., Adrian, R., Domis, L. D., Elser, J. J., Gaedke, U., Ibelings, B., Jeppesen, E., Lürling, M. F. L. L. W., Molinero, J. C., Mooij, W. M., van Donk, E., & Winder, M. (2012). Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model: Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 43(7), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251

@article{dcc986ae5441446aba1d2d75077f6d34,

title = "Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model: Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession",

abstract = "UV/H2O2 treatment can be part of the process converting surface water to drinking water, but would pose a potential problem when resulting in genotoxicity. This study investigates the genotoxicity of samples collected from the water treatment plant Andijk, applying UV/H2O2 treatment with an electrical energy dose of 0.54 kWh/m(3) and a H2O2 dose of 6 mg/l. Genotoxicity was tested in vitro using the Ames and Comet assay. All samples showed negative results. Samples were also tested in in vivo genotoxicity tests in Eastern mudminnow fish (Umbra pygmaea) by a sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and a Comet assay. No significant increases in SCEs were observed, but gill cells isolated from fish exposed to water obtained immediately after UV/H2O2 treatment and to Lake IJsselmeer water showed significantly increased DNA damage in the Comet assay. All other samples tested negative in this Comet assay. This indicates that DNA damaging compounds may result from the UV/H2O2 treatment, but also that these can be efficiently eliminated upon granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment of the water. It is concluded that when combined with this subsequent GAC treatment, UV/H2O2 treatment for the production of drinking water from surface water is not of concern with respect to genotoxicity.",

keywords = "phytoplankton spring bloom, fresh-water phytoplankton, critical depth hypothesis, clear-water, long-term, lake constance, climate-change, population-dynamics, food quality, deep lake",

author = "U. Sommer and R. Adrian and L.D. Domis and J.J. Elser and U. Gaedke and B. Ibelings and E. Jeppesen and M.F.L.L.W. L{\"u}rling and J.C. Molinero and W.M. Mooij and {van Donk}, E. and M. Winder",

note = "WOS:000311573500020",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "429--448",

journal = "Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics",

issn = "1543-592X",

publisher = "Annual Reviews",

number = "7",

}

Sommer, U, Adrian, R, Domis, LD, Elser, JJ, Gaedke, U, Ibelings, B, Jeppesen, E, Lürling, MFLLW, Molinero, JC, Mooij, WM, van Donk, E & Winder, M 2012, 'Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model: Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession', Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 429-448. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model: Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession

AU - Sommer, U.

AU - Adrian, R.

AU - Domis, L.D.

AU - Elser, J.J.

AU - Gaedke, U.

AU - Ibelings, B.

AU - Jeppesen, E.

AU - Lürling, M.F.L.L.W.

AU - Molinero, J.C.

AU - Mooij, W.M.

AU - van Donk, E.

AU - Winder, M.

N1 - WOS:000311573500020

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - UV/H2O2 treatment can be part of the process converting surface water to drinking water, but would pose a potential problem when resulting in genotoxicity. This study investigates the genotoxicity of samples collected from the water treatment plant Andijk, applying UV/H2O2 treatment with an electrical energy dose of 0.54 kWh/m(3) and a H2O2 dose of 6 mg/l. Genotoxicity was tested in vitro using the Ames and Comet assay. All samples showed negative results. Samples were also tested in in vivo genotoxicity tests in Eastern mudminnow fish (Umbra pygmaea) by a sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and a Comet assay. No significant increases in SCEs were observed, but gill cells isolated from fish exposed to water obtained immediately after UV/H2O2 treatment and to Lake IJsselmeer water showed significantly increased DNA damage in the Comet assay. All other samples tested negative in this Comet assay. This indicates that DNA damaging compounds may result from the UV/H2O2 treatment, but also that these can be efficiently eliminated upon granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment of the water. It is concluded that when combined with this subsequent GAC treatment, UV/H2O2 treatment for the production of drinking water from surface water is not of concern with respect to genotoxicity.

AB - UV/H2O2 treatment can be part of the process converting surface water to drinking water, but would pose a potential problem when resulting in genotoxicity. This study investigates the genotoxicity of samples collected from the water treatment plant Andijk, applying UV/H2O2 treatment with an electrical energy dose of 0.54 kWh/m(3) and a H2O2 dose of 6 mg/l. Genotoxicity was tested in vitro using the Ames and Comet assay. All samples showed negative results. Samples were also tested in in vivo genotoxicity tests in Eastern mudminnow fish (Umbra pygmaea) by a sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and a Comet assay. No significant increases in SCEs were observed, but gill cells isolated from fish exposed to water obtained immediately after UV/H2O2 treatment and to Lake IJsselmeer water showed significantly increased DNA damage in the Comet assay. All other samples tested negative in this Comet assay. This indicates that DNA damaging compounds may result from the UV/H2O2 treatment, but also that these can be efficiently eliminated upon granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment of the water. It is concluded that when combined with this subsequent GAC treatment, UV/H2O2 treatment for the production of drinking water from surface water is not of concern with respect to genotoxicity.

KW - phytoplankton spring bloom

KW - fresh-water phytoplankton

KW - critical depth hypothesis

KW - clear-water

KW - long-term

KW - lake constance

KW - climate-change

KW - population-dynamics

KW - food quality

KW - deep lake

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251

DO - 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160251

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 429

EP - 448

JO - Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

JF - Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

SN - 1543-592X

IS - 7

ER -

Beyond the Plankton Ecology Group (PEG) Model: Mechanisms Driving Plankton Succession

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this