Beyond argumentation: a practice-based approach to environmental policy

Jelle Hendrik Behagel*, Bas Arts, Esther Turnhout

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose that a practice-based approach to environmental policy can help consolidate theoretical understanding of and empirical focus on practices in IPA. Doing so counteracts a tendency to privilege knowledge and discourse in IPA and environmental policy analysis. We draw on multiple strands of practice theory to inform three sensitising concepts: situated agency, logic of practice, and performativity. These concepts provide the analytical tools to investigate how social order and social change originate from the entanglement of meaning and action in practice. We illustrate these concepts by applying them to practices of community forest management in the countries of Ethiopia and Tanzania. Our analysis suggests that a practice-based approach is able to offer nuanced and empirically grounded accounts of political struggles and democratic practices. Its potential is especially strong in cases where policy-making and policy ideas and outcomes are less clearly linked to argumentative processes. We conclude by arguing for further inclusion and consolidation of practice-based approaches within the tradition of interpretive policy analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)479-491
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Environmental Policy and Planning
Volume21
Issue number5
Early online date27 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

environmental policy
policy analysis
social change
policy making
forest management
consolidation
analysis
policy

Keywords

  • community forestry
  • discourse analysis
  • IPA
  • logic of practice
  • performativity
  • Practice theory
  • situated agency

Cite this

@article{e8ac6b508a004601b5159c0fe5b6b377,
title = "Beyond argumentation: a practice-based approach to environmental policy",
abstract = "We propose that a practice-based approach to environmental policy can help consolidate theoretical understanding of and empirical focus on practices in IPA. Doing so counteracts a tendency to privilege knowledge and discourse in IPA and environmental policy analysis. We draw on multiple strands of practice theory to inform three sensitising concepts: situated agency, logic of practice, and performativity. These concepts provide the analytical tools to investigate how social order and social change originate from the entanglement of meaning and action in practice. We illustrate these concepts by applying them to practices of community forest management in the countries of Ethiopia and Tanzania. Our analysis suggests that a practice-based approach is able to offer nuanced and empirically grounded accounts of political struggles and democratic practices. Its potential is especially strong in cases where policy-making and policy ideas and outcomes are less clearly linked to argumentative processes. We conclude by arguing for further inclusion and consolidation of practice-based approaches within the tradition of interpretive policy analysis.",
keywords = "community forestry, discourse analysis, IPA, logic of practice, performativity, Practice theory, situated agency",
author = "Behagel, {Jelle Hendrik} and Bas Arts and Esther Turnhout",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/1523908X.2017.1295841",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "479--491",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning",
issn = "1523-908X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "5",

}

Beyond argumentation: a practice-based approach to environmental policy. / Behagel, Jelle Hendrik; Arts, Bas; Turnhout, Esther.

In: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2019, p. 479-491.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beyond argumentation: a practice-based approach to environmental policy

AU - Behagel, Jelle Hendrik

AU - Arts, Bas

AU - Turnhout, Esther

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - We propose that a practice-based approach to environmental policy can help consolidate theoretical understanding of and empirical focus on practices in IPA. Doing so counteracts a tendency to privilege knowledge and discourse in IPA and environmental policy analysis. We draw on multiple strands of practice theory to inform three sensitising concepts: situated agency, logic of practice, and performativity. These concepts provide the analytical tools to investigate how social order and social change originate from the entanglement of meaning and action in practice. We illustrate these concepts by applying them to practices of community forest management in the countries of Ethiopia and Tanzania. Our analysis suggests that a practice-based approach is able to offer nuanced and empirically grounded accounts of political struggles and democratic practices. Its potential is especially strong in cases where policy-making and policy ideas and outcomes are less clearly linked to argumentative processes. We conclude by arguing for further inclusion and consolidation of practice-based approaches within the tradition of interpretive policy analysis.

AB - We propose that a practice-based approach to environmental policy can help consolidate theoretical understanding of and empirical focus on practices in IPA. Doing so counteracts a tendency to privilege knowledge and discourse in IPA and environmental policy analysis. We draw on multiple strands of practice theory to inform three sensitising concepts: situated agency, logic of practice, and performativity. These concepts provide the analytical tools to investigate how social order and social change originate from the entanglement of meaning and action in practice. We illustrate these concepts by applying them to practices of community forest management in the countries of Ethiopia and Tanzania. Our analysis suggests that a practice-based approach is able to offer nuanced and empirically grounded accounts of political struggles and democratic practices. Its potential is especially strong in cases where policy-making and policy ideas and outcomes are less clearly linked to argumentative processes. We conclude by arguing for further inclusion and consolidation of practice-based approaches within the tradition of interpretive policy analysis.

KW - community forestry

KW - discourse analysis

KW - IPA

KW - logic of practice

KW - performativity

KW - Practice theory

KW - situated agency

U2 - 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1295841

DO - 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1295841

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 479

EP - 491

JO - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

JF - Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

SN - 1523-908X

IS - 5

ER -