Below-ground resource partitioning alone cannot explain the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship: A field test using multiple tracers

Annette Jesch, Kathryn E. Barry*, Janneke M. Ravenek, Dörte Bachmann, Tanja Strecker, Alexandra Weigelt, Nina Buchmann, Hans de Kroon, Arthur Gessler, Liesje Mommer, Christiane Roscher, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Below-ground resource partitioning is among the most prominent hypotheses for driving the positive biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship. However, experimental tests of this hypothesis in biodiversity experiments are scarce, and the available evidence is not consistent. We tested the hypothesis that resource partitioning in space, in time or in both space and time combined drives the positive effect of diversity on both plant productivity and total community resource uptake. At the community level, we predicted that total community resource uptake and biomass production above- and below-ground will increase with increased species richness or functional group richness. We predicted that, at the species level, resource partition breadth will become narrower, and that overlap between the resource partitions of different species will become smaller with increasing species richness or functional group richness. We applied multiple resource tracers (Li and Rb as potassium analogues, the water isotopologues-H2 18O and 2H2O, and 15N) in three seasons at two depths across a species and functional group richness gradient at a grassland biodiversity experiment. We used this multidimensional resource tracer study to test if plant species partition resources with increasing plant diversity across space, time or both simultaneously. At the community level, total community resource uptake of nitrogen and potassium and above- and below-ground biomass increased significantly with increasing species richness but not with increasing functional group richness. However, we found no evidence that resource partition breadth or resource partition overlap decreased with increasing species richness for any resource in space, time or both space and time combined. Synthesis. These findings indicate that below-ground resource partitioning may not drive the enhanced resource uptake or biomass production found here. Instead, other mechanisms such as facilitation, species-specific biotic feedback or above-ground resource partitioning are likely necessary for enhanced overall ecosystem function.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2002-2018
JournalJournal of Ecology
Volume106
Issue number5
Early online date9 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Complementarity
  • Ecosystem function
  • Jena Experiment
  • Levins B
  • Proportional similarity
  • Rare element tracers
  • Resource uptake
  • Stable isotopes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Below-ground resource partitioning alone cannot explain the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship: A field test using multiple tracers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Datasets

    Data from: Below-ground resource partitioning alone cannot explain the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship: a field test using multiple tracers

    Jesch, A. (Creator), Barry, K. E. (Creator), Ravenek, J. M. (Creator), Bachmann, D. (Creator), Strecker, T. (Creator), Weigelt, A. (Creator), Buchmann, N. (Creator), de Kroon, H. (Creator), Gessler, A. (Creator), Mommer, L. (Creator), Roscher, C. (Creator), Scherer-Lorenzen, M. (Creator), University of Freiburg, 9 Mar 2018

    Dataset

    Cite this

    Jesch, A., Barry, K. E., Ravenek, J. M., Bachmann, D., Strecker, T., Weigelt, A., ... Scherer-Lorenzen, M. (2018). Below-ground resource partitioning alone cannot explain the biodiversity-ecosystem function relationship: A field test using multiple tracers. Journal of Ecology, 106(5), 2002-2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12947