Avoiding feed-food competition in practice; Environmental impact assessment of a novel egg production system

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingAbstract

Abstract

Feed cultivation on arable land (40% globally) results in less efficient food production than food crop cultivation. This inefficiency can be avoided using livestock feeds that do not compete with food production, so called “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs” (e.g. food by-products & waste and grazing resources). livestock, then, converts nutrients otherwise lost to the food system into valuable food. While this new role of livestock is theoretically well supported, its practical feasibility remains unstudied. We, therefore, assessed the environmental benefits of feeding only “low-opportunity-cost feed-stuffs” to industrially-housed laying hens on the commercial Kipster farm. Simultaneously we underline the shortcomings of conventional methods to account for such benefits. We quantified global warming potential, energy use and land use per kg egg, using life cycle assessment (LCA), Kipster eggs have a lower environmental impact (1.3 kg CO2-eq; 10 MJ; 2.9 m2), than free range and organic eggs (2.5-3.5 kg CO2-eq; 19-27 MJ; 4.1-6.8 m2), mainly due to the use of “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs”. Additionally, we illustrate that economic allocation used in LCA does not fully account for the environmental benefits of feeding “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs”, as it ignores interlinkages in the food system between, for example, sugar and beet pulp. Alternative circular allocation – allocating the full impact to the main product – reduces Kipsters environmental impact with 44% for GWP, 37% for EU and 90% for LU. Adequately capturing such complexities of the food system in LCA is of major importance to avoid promotion of mitigation measures that counteract resource use efficiency of the entire food system.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTrade-Offs in Science - Keeping the balance
Subtitle of host publicationAbstracts of the WIAS Science Day 2019
PublisherWageningen University & Research
Pages42-43
Publication statusPublished - 18 Mar 2019
EventWIAS Science Day 2019: Trade-Offs in Science - Congrescentrum de Werelt, Lunteren, Netherlands
Duration: 18 Mar 201918 Mar 2019

Conference

ConferenceWIAS Science Day 2019
Abbreviated titleKeeping the Balance
CountryNetherlands
CityLunteren
Period18/03/1918/03/19

Fingerprint

environmental assessment
opportunity costs
egg production
production technology
life cycle assessment
food production
environmental impact
livestock
beet pulp
livestock feeds
commercial farms
food crops
arable soils
ecosystem services
laying hens
byproducts
global warming
land use
grazing
sugars

Cite this

van Hal, O., Weijenberg, A., de Boer, I. J. M., & van Zanten, H. H. E. (2019). Avoiding feed-food competition in practice; Environmental impact assessment of a novel egg production system. In Trade-Offs in Science - Keeping the balance: Abstracts of the WIAS Science Day 2019 (pp. 42-43). Wageningen University & Research.
van Hal, O. ; Weijenberg, Adinda ; de Boer, I.J.M. ; van Zanten, H.H.E. / Avoiding feed-food competition in practice; Environmental impact assessment of a novel egg production system. Trade-Offs in Science - Keeping the balance: Abstracts of the WIAS Science Day 2019. Wageningen University & Research, 2019. pp. 42-43
@inbook{e6d8821730be46bcaad68f50d8da1579,
title = "Avoiding feed-food competition in practice; Environmental impact assessment of a novel egg production system",
abstract = "Feed cultivation on arable land (40{\%} globally) results in less efficient food production than food crop cultivation. This inefficiency can be avoided using livestock feeds that do not compete with food production, so called “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs” (e.g. food by-products & waste and grazing resources). livestock, then, converts nutrients otherwise lost to the food system into valuable food. While this new role of livestock is theoretically well supported, its practical feasibility remains unstudied. We, therefore, assessed the environmental benefits of feeding only “low-opportunity-cost feed-stuffs” to industrially-housed laying hens on the commercial Kipster farm. Simultaneously we underline the shortcomings of conventional methods to account for such benefits. We quantified global warming potential, energy use and land use per kg egg, using life cycle assessment (LCA), Kipster eggs have a lower environmental impact (1.3 kg CO2-eq; 10 MJ; 2.9 m2), than free range and organic eggs (2.5-3.5 kg CO2-eq; 19-27 MJ; 4.1-6.8 m2), mainly due to the use of “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs”. Additionally, we illustrate that economic allocation used in LCA does not fully account for the environmental benefits of feeding “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs”, as it ignores interlinkages in the food system between, for example, sugar and beet pulp. Alternative circular allocation – allocating the full impact to the main product – reduces Kipsters environmental impact with 44{\%} for GWP, 37{\%} for EU and 90{\%} for LU. Adequately capturing such complexities of the food system in LCA is of major importance to avoid promotion of mitigation measures that counteract resource use efficiency of the entire food system.",
author = "{van Hal}, O. and Adinda Weijenberg and {de Boer}, I.J.M. and {van Zanten}, H.H.E.",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "18",
language = "English",
pages = "42--43",
booktitle = "Trade-Offs in Science - Keeping the balance",
publisher = "Wageningen University & Research",

}

van Hal, O, Weijenberg, A, de Boer, IJM & van Zanten, HHE 2019, Avoiding feed-food competition in practice; Environmental impact assessment of a novel egg production system. in Trade-Offs in Science - Keeping the balance: Abstracts of the WIAS Science Day 2019. Wageningen University & Research, pp. 42-43, WIAS Science Day 2019, Lunteren, Netherlands, 18/03/19.

Avoiding feed-food competition in practice; Environmental impact assessment of a novel egg production system. / van Hal, O.; Weijenberg, Adinda; de Boer, I.J.M.; van Zanten, H.H.E.

Trade-Offs in Science - Keeping the balance: Abstracts of the WIAS Science Day 2019. Wageningen University & Research, 2019. p. 42-43.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingAbstract

TY - CHAP

T1 - Avoiding feed-food competition in practice; Environmental impact assessment of a novel egg production system

AU - van Hal, O.

AU - Weijenberg, Adinda

AU - de Boer, I.J.M.

AU - van Zanten, H.H.E.

PY - 2019/3/18

Y1 - 2019/3/18

N2 - Feed cultivation on arable land (40% globally) results in less efficient food production than food crop cultivation. This inefficiency can be avoided using livestock feeds that do not compete with food production, so called “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs” (e.g. food by-products & waste and grazing resources). livestock, then, converts nutrients otherwise lost to the food system into valuable food. While this new role of livestock is theoretically well supported, its practical feasibility remains unstudied. We, therefore, assessed the environmental benefits of feeding only “low-opportunity-cost feed-stuffs” to industrially-housed laying hens on the commercial Kipster farm. Simultaneously we underline the shortcomings of conventional methods to account for such benefits. We quantified global warming potential, energy use and land use per kg egg, using life cycle assessment (LCA), Kipster eggs have a lower environmental impact (1.3 kg CO2-eq; 10 MJ; 2.9 m2), than free range and organic eggs (2.5-3.5 kg CO2-eq; 19-27 MJ; 4.1-6.8 m2), mainly due to the use of “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs”. Additionally, we illustrate that economic allocation used in LCA does not fully account for the environmental benefits of feeding “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs”, as it ignores interlinkages in the food system between, for example, sugar and beet pulp. Alternative circular allocation – allocating the full impact to the main product – reduces Kipsters environmental impact with 44% for GWP, 37% for EU and 90% for LU. Adequately capturing such complexities of the food system in LCA is of major importance to avoid promotion of mitigation measures that counteract resource use efficiency of the entire food system.

AB - Feed cultivation on arable land (40% globally) results in less efficient food production than food crop cultivation. This inefficiency can be avoided using livestock feeds that do not compete with food production, so called “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs” (e.g. food by-products & waste and grazing resources). livestock, then, converts nutrients otherwise lost to the food system into valuable food. While this new role of livestock is theoretically well supported, its practical feasibility remains unstudied. We, therefore, assessed the environmental benefits of feeding only “low-opportunity-cost feed-stuffs” to industrially-housed laying hens on the commercial Kipster farm. Simultaneously we underline the shortcomings of conventional methods to account for such benefits. We quantified global warming potential, energy use and land use per kg egg, using life cycle assessment (LCA), Kipster eggs have a lower environmental impact (1.3 kg CO2-eq; 10 MJ; 2.9 m2), than free range and organic eggs (2.5-3.5 kg CO2-eq; 19-27 MJ; 4.1-6.8 m2), mainly due to the use of “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs”. Additionally, we illustrate that economic allocation used in LCA does not fully account for the environmental benefits of feeding “low-opportunity-cost feedstuffs”, as it ignores interlinkages in the food system between, for example, sugar and beet pulp. Alternative circular allocation – allocating the full impact to the main product – reduces Kipsters environmental impact with 44% for GWP, 37% for EU and 90% for LU. Adequately capturing such complexities of the food system in LCA is of major importance to avoid promotion of mitigation measures that counteract resource use efficiency of the entire food system.

M3 - Abstract

SP - 42

EP - 43

BT - Trade-Offs in Science - Keeping the balance

PB - Wageningen University & Research

ER -

van Hal O, Weijenberg A, de Boer IJM, van Zanten HHE. Avoiding feed-food competition in practice; Environmental impact assessment of a novel egg production system. In Trade-Offs in Science - Keeping the balance: Abstracts of the WIAS Science Day 2019. Wageningen University & Research. 2019. p. 42-43