Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assumptions behind size-based ecosystem models are realistic

  • Ken H. Andersen*
  • , Julia L. Blanchard
  • , Elizabeth A. Fulton
  • , Henrik Gislason
  • , Nis Sand Jacobsen
  • , Tobias van Kooten
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

A recent publication about balanced harvesting (Froese et al., ICES Journal of Marine Science; 73: 1640-1650) contains several erroneous statements about size-spectrum models. We refute the statements by showing that the assumptions pertaining to size-spectrum models discussed by Froese et al. are realistic and consistent. We further show that the assumption about density-dependence being described by a stock recruitment relationship is responsible for determining whether a peak in the cohort biomass of a population occurs late or early in life. Finally, we argue that there is indeed a constructive role for a wide suite of ecosystem models to evaluate fishing strategies in an ecosystem context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1651-1655
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • Balanced harvesting
  • Cohort biomass
  • Size-spectrum model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assumptions behind size-based ecosystem models are realistic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this