Abstract
A recent publication about balanced harvesting (Froese et al., ICES Journal of Marine Science; 73: 1640-1650) contains several erroneous statements about size-spectrum models. We refute the statements by showing that the assumptions pertaining to size-spectrum models discussed by Froese et al. are realistic and consistent. We further show that the assumption about density-dependence being described by a stock recruitment relationship is responsible for determining whether a peak in the cohort biomass of a population occurs late or early in life. Finally, we argue that there is indeed a constructive role for a wide suite of ecosystem models to evaluate fishing strategies in an ecosystem context.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1651-1655 |
| Journal | ICES Journal of Marine Science |
| Volume | 73 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 14 Life Below Water
Keywords
- Balanced harvesting
- Cohort biomass
- Size-spectrum model
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assumptions behind size-based ecosystem models are realistic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver