Assumptions behind size-based ecosystem models are realistic

Ken H. Andersen*, Julia L. Blanchard, Elizabeth A. Fulton, Henrik Gislason, Nis Sand Jacobsen, Tobias van Kooten

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A recent publication about balanced harvesting (Froese et al., ICES Journal of Marine Science; 73: 1640-1650) contains several erroneous statements about size-spectrum models. We refute the statements by showing that the assumptions pertaining to size-spectrum models discussed by Froese et al. are realistic and consistent. We further show that the assumption about density-dependence being described by a stock recruitment relationship is responsible for determining whether a peak in the cohort biomass of a population occurs late or early in life. Finally, we argue that there is indeed a constructive role for a wide suite of ecosystem models to evaluate fishing strategies in an ecosystem context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1651-1655
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume73
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Balanced harvesting
  • Cohort biomass
  • Size-spectrum model

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Assumptions behind size-based ecosystem models are realistic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Andersen, K. H., Blanchard, J. L., Fulton, E. A., Gislason, H., Jacobsen, N. S., & van Kooten, T. (2016). Assumptions behind size-based ecosystem models are realistic. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(6), 1651-1655. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv211