Abstract
Consumers in many European countries do not equally meet the recommended
daily intake levels for fish consumption. Various factors that can influence fish
consumption behaviour have been identified but limited research has been performed on
fish consumption behaviour, discriminating between farmed and wild fish. The present
survey study confirmed differences in total fish consumption, farmed fish and wild fish
consumption behaviour in Belgium, Norway and Spain. Spanish consumers consumed
more frequently fish of each category than Norwegian consumers. Belgian consumers
reported the lowest consumption frequency of fish. Accordingly, health involvement and
attitudes towards fish consumption decreased from Spain over Norway to Belgium, suggesting
a positive association of health involvement and attitudes towards fish consumption
with total fish consumption. Similar effects were found for farmed and wild fish consumption.
In general consumers in all countries were poorly aware of the origin of the fish
they consume, despite the mandatory indication of origin on fish labels. Across countries,
an increased awareness about fish origin was found with increased fish consumption. The
findings of the study indicate that farmed and wild fish consumption should be further
stimulated among Belgian, Norwegian and Spanish consumers in association with a
healthy and positive meal. Additionally, given the limited awareness of the origin of fish,
transparency on the issue of farmed origin will be important in order to anticipate potential
adverse communication.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 475-488 |
Journal | Aquaculture International |
Volume | 19 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- consumer perception
- scientific evidence
- european countries
- benefits
- behavior
- seafood
- risks
- convenience
- translation
- information