TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the success of marine ecosystem restoration using meta-analysis
AU - Danovaro, R.
AU - Aronson, J.
AU - Bianchelli, S.
AU - Boström, C.
AU - Chen, W.
AU - Cimino, R.
AU - Corinaldesi, C.
AU - Cortina-Segarra, J.
AU - D’Ambrosio, P.
AU - Gambi, C.
AU - Garrabou, J.
AU - Giorgetti, A.
AU - Grehan, A.
AU - Hannachi, A.
AU - Mangialajo, L.
AU - Morato, T.
AU - Orfanidis, S.
AU - Papadopoulou, N.
AU - Ramirez-Llodra, E.
AU - Smith, C.J.
AU - Snelgrove, P.
AU - van de Koppel, J.
AU - van Tatenhove, J.
AU - Fraschetti, S.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Marine ecosystem restoration success stories are needed to incentivize society and private enterprises to build capacity and stimulate investments. Yet, we still must demonstrate that restoration efforts can effectively contribute to achieving the targets set by the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis on 764 active restoration interventions across a wide range of marine habitats worldwide. We show that marine ecosystem restorations have an average success of ~64% and that they are: viable for a large variety of marine habitats, including deep-sea ecosystems; highly successful for saltmarshes, tropical coral reefs and habitat-forming species such as animal forests; successful at all spatial scales, so that restoration over large spatial scales can be done using multiple interventions at small-spatial scales that better represent the natural variability, and scalable through dedicated policies, regulations, and financing instruments. Restoration interventions were surprisingly effective even in areas where human impacts persisted, demonstrating that successful restorations can be initiated before all stressors have been removed. These results demonstrate the immediate feasibility of a global ‘blue restoration’ plan even for deep-sea ecosystems, enabled by increasing availability of new and cost-effective technologies.
AB - Marine ecosystem restoration success stories are needed to incentivize society and private enterprises to build capacity and stimulate investments. Yet, we still must demonstrate that restoration efforts can effectively contribute to achieving the targets set by the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis on 764 active restoration interventions across a wide range of marine habitats worldwide. We show that marine ecosystem restorations have an average success of ~64% and that they are: viable for a large variety of marine habitats, including deep-sea ecosystems; highly successful for saltmarshes, tropical coral reefs and habitat-forming species such as animal forests; successful at all spatial scales, so that restoration over large spatial scales can be done using multiple interventions at small-spatial scales that better represent the natural variability, and scalable through dedicated policies, regulations, and financing instruments. Restoration interventions were surprisingly effective even in areas where human impacts persisted, demonstrating that successful restorations can be initiated before all stressors have been removed. These results demonstrate the immediate feasibility of a global ‘blue restoration’ plan even for deep-sea ecosystems, enabled by increasing availability of new and cost-effective technologies.
U2 - 10.1038/s41467-025-57254-2
DO - 10.1038/s41467-025-57254-2
M3 - Article
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 16
JO - Nature Communications
JF - Nature Communications
IS - 1
M1 - 3062
ER -