Assessing and controlling health risks from animal husbandry

T.G. Kimman, M. Hoek, M.C.M. de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A fierce debate is going on about the risks of animal husbandry for human health and the quality of control measures to reduce such risks. Risks include the occurrence of infectious diseases, in particular zoonoses, and the high antibiotic use in livestock production contributing to emergence of antibiotic resistance and its spread from animals to humans. On the other hand, many infectious diseases of animals and humans have been eliminated, including brucellosis, tuberculosis, leptospirosis, and BSE, resulting in an animal husbandry that perhaps has never been as safe as nowadays. So while many health risks have been brought under control, the public opinion appears to reflect a feeling of anxiety and mistrust in authorities and producers to deal with the potential and remaining public health risks associated with animal husbandry. These risks, often associated with the intensification of animal production, are nonetheless indeed real. An animal husbandry that is “completely” safe and healthy for humans and animals requires a central role for disease prevention in the design and management of animal husbandry systems. It also requires that rapid and adequate responses are taken by veterinary and medical authorities on both perceived and real risks. Communication on health risks must be complete and open. Because actions to protect the health of animals often also benefit human health, there is usually no conflict of interests between humans and animals regarding their health needs. We emphasize the need to use the precautionary principle in matters of human and animal health. This implies that there must not be a “clash of cultures” between medical and veterinary professionals and policy makers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-14
JournalNJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
Volume66
Issue numberSI
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Animal Husbandry
animal husbandry
health risk
animal
Health
infectious disease
contagious disease
health
brucellosis
bovine spongiform encephalopathy
precautionary principle
tuberculosis
antibiotic resistance
infectious diseases
livestock farming
Communicable Diseases
human health
animals
antibiotics
public health

Keywords

  • resistant staphylococcus-aureus
  • virus transmission
  • infectious-diseases
  • quantification
  • vaccination
  • origin
  • netherlands
  • emergence
  • pathogens
  • vaccines

Cite this

@article{e36a332ec0454107b7745987192d596b,
title = "Assessing and controlling health risks from animal husbandry",
abstract = "A fierce debate is going on about the risks of animal husbandry for human health and the quality of control measures to reduce such risks. Risks include the occurrence of infectious diseases, in particular zoonoses, and the high antibiotic use in livestock production contributing to emergence of antibiotic resistance and its spread from animals to humans. On the other hand, many infectious diseases of animals and humans have been eliminated, including brucellosis, tuberculosis, leptospirosis, and BSE, resulting in an animal husbandry that perhaps has never been as safe as nowadays. So while many health risks have been brought under control, the public opinion appears to reflect a feeling of anxiety and mistrust in authorities and producers to deal with the potential and remaining public health risks associated with animal husbandry. These risks, often associated with the intensification of animal production, are nonetheless indeed real. An animal husbandry that is “completely” safe and healthy for humans and animals requires a central role for disease prevention in the design and management of animal husbandry systems. It also requires that rapid and adequate responses are taken by veterinary and medical authorities on both perceived and real risks. Communication on health risks must be complete and open. Because actions to protect the health of animals often also benefit human health, there is usually no conflict of interests between humans and animals regarding their health needs. We emphasize the need to use the precautionary principle in matters of human and animal health. This implies that there must not be a “clash of cultures” between medical and veterinary professionals and policy makers.",
keywords = "resistant staphylococcus-aureus, virus transmission, infectious-diseases, quantification, vaccination, origin, netherlands, emergence, pathogens, vaccines",
author = "T.G. Kimman and M. Hoek and {de Jong}, M.C.M.",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.njas.2013.05.003",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "7--14",
journal = "NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences",
issn = "1573-5214",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "SI",

}

Assessing and controlling health risks from animal husbandry. / Kimman, T.G.; Hoek, M.; de Jong, M.C.M.

In: NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, Vol. 66, No. SI, 2013, p. 7-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing and controlling health risks from animal husbandry

AU - Kimman, T.G.

AU - Hoek, M.

AU - de Jong, M.C.M.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - A fierce debate is going on about the risks of animal husbandry for human health and the quality of control measures to reduce such risks. Risks include the occurrence of infectious diseases, in particular zoonoses, and the high antibiotic use in livestock production contributing to emergence of antibiotic resistance and its spread from animals to humans. On the other hand, many infectious diseases of animals and humans have been eliminated, including brucellosis, tuberculosis, leptospirosis, and BSE, resulting in an animal husbandry that perhaps has never been as safe as nowadays. So while many health risks have been brought under control, the public opinion appears to reflect a feeling of anxiety and mistrust in authorities and producers to deal with the potential and remaining public health risks associated with animal husbandry. These risks, often associated with the intensification of animal production, are nonetheless indeed real. An animal husbandry that is “completely” safe and healthy for humans and animals requires a central role for disease prevention in the design and management of animal husbandry systems. It also requires that rapid and adequate responses are taken by veterinary and medical authorities on both perceived and real risks. Communication on health risks must be complete and open. Because actions to protect the health of animals often also benefit human health, there is usually no conflict of interests between humans and animals regarding their health needs. We emphasize the need to use the precautionary principle in matters of human and animal health. This implies that there must not be a “clash of cultures” between medical and veterinary professionals and policy makers.

AB - A fierce debate is going on about the risks of animal husbandry for human health and the quality of control measures to reduce such risks. Risks include the occurrence of infectious diseases, in particular zoonoses, and the high antibiotic use in livestock production contributing to emergence of antibiotic resistance and its spread from animals to humans. On the other hand, many infectious diseases of animals and humans have been eliminated, including brucellosis, tuberculosis, leptospirosis, and BSE, resulting in an animal husbandry that perhaps has never been as safe as nowadays. So while many health risks have been brought under control, the public opinion appears to reflect a feeling of anxiety and mistrust in authorities and producers to deal with the potential and remaining public health risks associated with animal husbandry. These risks, often associated with the intensification of animal production, are nonetheless indeed real. An animal husbandry that is “completely” safe and healthy for humans and animals requires a central role for disease prevention in the design and management of animal husbandry systems. It also requires that rapid and adequate responses are taken by veterinary and medical authorities on both perceived and real risks. Communication on health risks must be complete and open. Because actions to protect the health of animals often also benefit human health, there is usually no conflict of interests between humans and animals regarding their health needs. We emphasize the need to use the precautionary principle in matters of human and animal health. This implies that there must not be a “clash of cultures” between medical and veterinary professionals and policy makers.

KW - resistant staphylococcus-aureus

KW - virus transmission

KW - infectious-diseases

KW - quantification

KW - vaccination

KW - origin

KW - netherlands

KW - emergence

KW - pathogens

KW - vaccines

U2 - 10.1016/j.njas.2013.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.njas.2013.05.003

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 7

EP - 14

JO - NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences

JF - NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences

SN - 1573-5214

IS - SI

ER -