Are feldspar SAR protocols appropriate for post-IR IRSL dating?

R.H. Kars, T. Reimann, J. Wallinga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently proposed post-infrared infrared stimulated luminescence (post-IR IRSL or pIR) dating protocols have largely overcome problems associated with anomalous fading and have become increasingly important for age determination of Quaternary sediments. Here, we investigate the suitability of the proposed post-IR IRSL protocols for accurate equivalent-dose estimation on K-feldspar extracts. Our research focuses on potential sensitivity changes between the natural signal and the first test dose signal in single-aliquot regenerative dose (SAR) procedures that are not detected and thus not corrected using test-dose responses. For these investigations, we employed the Single Aliquot Regeneration and Added dose (SARA) procedure, which combines equivalent-dose estimation with a dose recovery test. Results indicated that high-temperature preheats (>260 °C for 60 s) may induce a trapping sensitivity change in IRSL signals measured at low temperature (100 °C) after a high temperature preheat. Our results indicate that the SAR protocol is appropriate for equivalent-dose determination using elevated-temperature pIR signals (e.g. pIR at 290 °C or multiple elevated temperature pIR at 250 °C). The SAR protocol may also be appropriate for equivalent-dose determination using low temperature pIR signals, provided that the combination of preheat and measurement temperature
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-136
JournalQuaternary Geochronology
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • anomalous fading correction
  • infrared stimulated luminescence
  • regenerative-dose protocol
  • k-feldspar
  • chinese loess
  • quartz
  • sediments
  • samples
  • deposits
  • signals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are feldspar SAR protocols appropriate for post-IR IRSL dating?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this