Are farmers searching for an African green revolution? Exploring the solution space for agricultural intensification in southern Mali

Mary Ollenburger, Todd Crane, Katrien Descheemaeker, Ken E. Giller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Development actors, including the African Union, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa and bilateral donors, promote a technology-driven sustainable intensification of agriculture as a way to feed a growing world population and reduce rural poverty. A broader view of smallholder agriculture in the context of rural livelihoods suggests that technological solutions alone are unlikely to meet these goals. Analysis of the solution space for agricultural interventions in a high potential area of southern Mali shows that intensification can lift most farm households out of extreme poverty and guarantee their food self-sufficiency. However, the most effective options do not fit the usual definition of sustainable intensification, increasing production per unit land while protecting the natural environment. Cropland expansion combined with the good yields seen in on-station experiments can nearly eliminate extreme poverty, while the biggest impact may come from taking advantage of peak seasonal prices for crops like groundnut. Other profitable alternatives can include meat production with small ruminants or sales of milk from cows. However, off-farm employment opportunities like gold mining outperform currently attainable agricultural options in terms of profitability. Options for rural households should fit within the households’ socio-ecological niches and respond to their priorities in order to be successful. Given the relatively low impact of (sustainable) intensification technologies alone, a rethinking of the role of agricultural research in development is needed in order to align interventions with farmer priorities and meet development goals.

LanguageEnglish
Pages288-310
JournalExperimental Agriculture
Volume55
Issue number2
Early online date17 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Mali
households
farmers
poverty
sustainable agricultural intensification
off-farm employment
crop prices
rural poverty
small-scale farming
employment opportunities
meat production
small ruminants
livelihood
agricultural research
profitability
gold
sales
peanuts
niches
cows

Cite this

@article{1311a9b8162a4c09a82f1b4af0edcd7e,
title = "Are farmers searching for an African green revolution? Exploring the solution space for agricultural intensification in southern Mali",
abstract = "Development actors, including the African Union, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa and bilateral donors, promote a technology-driven sustainable intensification of agriculture as a way to feed a growing world population and reduce rural poverty. A broader view of smallholder agriculture in the context of rural livelihoods suggests that technological solutions alone are unlikely to meet these goals. Analysis of the solution space for agricultural interventions in a high potential area of southern Mali shows that intensification can lift most farm households out of extreme poverty and guarantee their food self-sufficiency. However, the most effective options do not fit the usual definition of sustainable intensification, increasing production per unit land while protecting the natural environment. Cropland expansion combined with the good yields seen in on-station experiments can nearly eliminate extreme poverty, while the biggest impact may come from taking advantage of peak seasonal prices for crops like groundnut. Other profitable alternatives can include meat production with small ruminants or sales of milk from cows. However, off-farm employment opportunities like gold mining outperform currently attainable agricultural options in terms of profitability. Options for rural households should fit within the households’ socio-ecological niches and respond to their priorities in order to be successful. Given the relatively low impact of (sustainable) intensification technologies alone, a rethinking of the role of agricultural research in development is needed in order to align interventions with farmer priorities and meet development goals.",
author = "Mary Ollenburger and Todd Crane and Katrien Descheemaeker and Giller, {Ken E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S0014479718000169",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "288--310",
journal = "Experimental Agriculture",
issn = "0014-4797",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

Are farmers searching for an African green revolution? Exploring the solution space for agricultural intensification in southern Mali. / Ollenburger, Mary; Crane, Todd; Descheemaeker, Katrien; Giller, Ken E.

In: Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 55, No. 2, 04.2019, p. 288-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are farmers searching for an African green revolution? Exploring the solution space for agricultural intensification in southern Mali

AU - Ollenburger, Mary

AU - Crane, Todd

AU - Descheemaeker, Katrien

AU - Giller, Ken E.

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Development actors, including the African Union, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa and bilateral donors, promote a technology-driven sustainable intensification of agriculture as a way to feed a growing world population and reduce rural poverty. A broader view of smallholder agriculture in the context of rural livelihoods suggests that technological solutions alone are unlikely to meet these goals. Analysis of the solution space for agricultural interventions in a high potential area of southern Mali shows that intensification can lift most farm households out of extreme poverty and guarantee their food self-sufficiency. However, the most effective options do not fit the usual definition of sustainable intensification, increasing production per unit land while protecting the natural environment. Cropland expansion combined with the good yields seen in on-station experiments can nearly eliminate extreme poverty, while the biggest impact may come from taking advantage of peak seasonal prices for crops like groundnut. Other profitable alternatives can include meat production with small ruminants or sales of milk from cows. However, off-farm employment opportunities like gold mining outperform currently attainable agricultural options in terms of profitability. Options for rural households should fit within the households’ socio-ecological niches and respond to their priorities in order to be successful. Given the relatively low impact of (sustainable) intensification technologies alone, a rethinking of the role of agricultural research in development is needed in order to align interventions with farmer priorities and meet development goals.

AB - Development actors, including the African Union, the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa and bilateral donors, promote a technology-driven sustainable intensification of agriculture as a way to feed a growing world population and reduce rural poverty. A broader view of smallholder agriculture in the context of rural livelihoods suggests that technological solutions alone are unlikely to meet these goals. Analysis of the solution space for agricultural interventions in a high potential area of southern Mali shows that intensification can lift most farm households out of extreme poverty and guarantee their food self-sufficiency. However, the most effective options do not fit the usual definition of sustainable intensification, increasing production per unit land while protecting the natural environment. Cropland expansion combined with the good yields seen in on-station experiments can nearly eliminate extreme poverty, while the biggest impact may come from taking advantage of peak seasonal prices for crops like groundnut. Other profitable alternatives can include meat production with small ruminants or sales of milk from cows. However, off-farm employment opportunities like gold mining outperform currently attainable agricultural options in terms of profitability. Options for rural households should fit within the households’ socio-ecological niches and respond to their priorities in order to be successful. Given the relatively low impact of (sustainable) intensification technologies alone, a rethinking of the role of agricultural research in development is needed in order to align interventions with farmer priorities and meet development goals.

U2 - 10.1017/S0014479718000169

DO - 10.1017/S0014479718000169

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 288

EP - 310

JO - Experimental Agriculture

T2 - Experimental Agriculture

JF - Experimental Agriculture

SN - 0014-4797

IS - 2

ER -