TY - GEN
T1 - Are deep learning models more effective against traditional models for load demand forecasting?
AU - Jain, Mayank
AU - Alskaif, Tarek
AU - Dev, Soumyabrata
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was conducted with the financial support of SFI Research Centres Programme under Grant 13/RC/2106 P2 at the ADAPT SFI Research Centre at University College Dublin. ADAPT, the SFI Research Centre for AI-Driven Digital Content Technology, is funded by Science Foundation Ireland through the SFI Research Centres Programme. Send correspondence to S. Dev, email: soumyabrata.dev@ucd.ie
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Consumer level load demand forecasting has caught an eye of many researchers since the data from smart meters has become available with high temporal resolutions. Long-sort-term-memory (LSTM) based deep learning models have gained significant popularity in time series forecasting tasks. While many such models have been proposed in the literature for the job, its difficult to analyze and compare the efficacy of these models due to two main reasons. Firstly, the lack of explainability of these models; and secondly, the proposed models are generally tested on very different datasets. Hence, this paper aims to analyze two of the most commonly used models, i.e. standard LSTM, and Bi-directional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), on a publicly available dataset in order to provide common ground for valid comparison. The paper considers standard baselines, statistical and machine learning models where it notes that random forest can perform better or at par with the considered LSTM-based models. This is the result of efficient data curation and pre-processing techniques that were employed using the information from heuristics.
AB - Consumer level load demand forecasting has caught an eye of many researchers since the data from smart meters has become available with high temporal resolutions. Long-sort-term-memory (LSTM) based deep learning models have gained significant popularity in time series forecasting tasks. While many such models have been proposed in the literature for the job, its difficult to analyze and compare the efficacy of these models due to two main reasons. Firstly, the lack of explainability of these models; and secondly, the proposed models are generally tested on very different datasets. Hence, this paper aims to analyze two of the most commonly used models, i.e. standard LSTM, and Bi-directional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), on a publicly available dataset in order to provide common ground for valid comparison. The paper considers standard baselines, statistical and machine learning models where it notes that random forest can perform better or at par with the considered LSTM-based models. This is the result of efficient data curation and pre-processing techniques that were employed using the information from heuristics.
KW - LSTMs
KW - machine learning
KW - model comparison
KW - time series forecasting
U2 - 10.1109/SEST53650.2022.9898424
DO - 10.1109/SEST53650.2022.9898424
M3 - Conference paper
AN - SCOPUS:85136912364
T3 - SEST 2022 - 5th International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies
BT - SEST 2022 - 5th International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 5th International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies, SEST 2022
Y2 - 5 September 2022 through 7 September 2022
ER -