Application of the MODIS MOD 17 Net Primary Production Product in Grassland Carrying Capacity Assessment

J. de Leeuw, A. Rizayeva, E. Namazov, E. Bayramov, M.T. Marshall, J. Etzold, R. Neudert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Remote sensing based grassland carrying capacity assessments are not commonly applied in rangeland management. Possible reasons for this include non-equilibrium thinking in rangeland management, and the costliness of existing remotely sensed biomass estimation that carrying capacity assessments require. Here, we present a less demanding approach for grassland biomass estimation using the MODIS Net Primary Production (NPP) product and demonstrate its use in carrying capacity assessment over the mountain grasslands of Azerbaijan.Based on publicly available estimates of the fraction of total NPP partitioned to above ground NPP (fANPP) we calculate the above ground biomass produced from 2005 to 2014. Validation of the predicted above ground biomass with independent field biomass data collected in 2007 and 2008 confirmed the accuracy of theaboveground biomass product and hence we considered it appropriate for further use in the carrying capacity assessment. A first assessment approach, which allowed for consumption of 65% of above ground biomass, resulted in an average carrying capacity of 12.6 sheep per ha. A second more realistic approach, which further restricted grazing on slopes steeper than 10%, resulted in a stocking density of 6.20 sheep per ha and a carrying capacity of 3.93 million sheep. Our analysis reveals overgrazing of the mountain grasslands because the current livestock population which consists of at least 8 million sheep, 0.5 million goats and an unknown number of cattle exceeds the predicted carrying capacity of 3.93 million sheep. We consider that the geographically explicit advice on sustainable stocking densities is particularly attractive to regulate grazing intensity in geographically varied terrain such as the mountain grasslands of Azerbaijan. We further conclude that the approach, given its generic nature and the free availability of most input data, could be replicated elsewhere. Hence, we advise considering its use where traditional carrying capacity assessments are difficult to implement.
LanguageEnglish
Pages66-76
JournalInternational Journal of applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
Volume78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

net primary production
carrying capacity
MODIS
Biomass
grassland
sheep
aboveground biomass
stocking density
biomass
rangeland
mountain
grazing
overgrazing
product
goat
Agriculture
Remote sensing
cattle
livestock
Availability

Cite this

de Leeuw, J. ; Rizayeva, A. ; Namazov, E. ; Bayramov, E. ; Marshall, M.T. ; Etzold, J. ; Neudert, R. / Application of the MODIS MOD 17 Net Primary Production Product in Grassland Carrying Capacity Assessment. In: International Journal of applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2019 ; Vol. 78. pp. 66-76.
@article{cffcbddb5a4247b2819d547a8cbbadf9,
title = "Application of the MODIS MOD 17 Net Primary Production Product in Grassland Carrying Capacity Assessment",
abstract = "Remote sensing based grassland carrying capacity assessments are not commonly applied in rangeland management. Possible reasons for this include non-equilibrium thinking in rangeland management, and the costliness of existing remotely sensed biomass estimation that carrying capacity assessments require. Here, we present a less demanding approach for grassland biomass estimation using the MODIS Net Primary Production (NPP) product and demonstrate its use in carrying capacity assessment over the mountain grasslands of Azerbaijan.Based on publicly available estimates of the fraction of total NPP partitioned to above ground NPP (fANPP) we calculate the above ground biomass produced from 2005 to 2014. Validation of the predicted above ground biomass with independent field biomass data collected in 2007 and 2008 confirmed the accuracy of theaboveground biomass product and hence we considered it appropriate for further use in the carrying capacity assessment. A first assessment approach, which allowed for consumption of 65{\%} of above ground biomass, resulted in an average carrying capacity of 12.6 sheep per ha. A second more realistic approach, which further restricted grazing on slopes steeper than 10{\%}, resulted in a stocking density of 6.20 sheep per ha and a carrying capacity of 3.93 million sheep. Our analysis reveals overgrazing of the mountain grasslands because the current livestock population which consists of at least 8 million sheep, 0.5 million goats and an unknown number of cattle exceeds the predicted carrying capacity of 3.93 million sheep. We consider that the geographically explicit advice on sustainable stocking densities is particularly attractive to regulate grazing intensity in geographically varied terrain such as the mountain grasslands of Azerbaijan. We further conclude that the approach, given its generic nature and the free availability of most input data, could be replicated elsewhere. Hence, we advise considering its use where traditional carrying capacity assessments are difficult to implement.",
author = "{de Leeuw}, J. and A. Rizayeva and E. Namazov and E. Bayramov and M.T. Marshall and J. Etzold and R. Neudert",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.014",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "66--76",
journal = "International Journal of applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation",
issn = "0303-2434",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Application of the MODIS MOD 17 Net Primary Production Product in Grassland Carrying Capacity Assessment. / de Leeuw, J.; Rizayeva, A.; Namazov, E.; Bayramov, E.; Marshall, M.T.; Etzold, J.; Neudert, R.

In: International Journal of applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, Vol. 78, 2019, p. 66-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of the MODIS MOD 17 Net Primary Production Product in Grassland Carrying Capacity Assessment

AU - de Leeuw, J.

AU - Rizayeva, A.

AU - Namazov, E.

AU - Bayramov, E.

AU - Marshall, M.T.

AU - Etzold, J.

AU - Neudert, R.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Remote sensing based grassland carrying capacity assessments are not commonly applied in rangeland management. Possible reasons for this include non-equilibrium thinking in rangeland management, and the costliness of existing remotely sensed biomass estimation that carrying capacity assessments require. Here, we present a less demanding approach for grassland biomass estimation using the MODIS Net Primary Production (NPP) product and demonstrate its use in carrying capacity assessment over the mountain grasslands of Azerbaijan.Based on publicly available estimates of the fraction of total NPP partitioned to above ground NPP (fANPP) we calculate the above ground biomass produced from 2005 to 2014. Validation of the predicted above ground biomass with independent field biomass data collected in 2007 and 2008 confirmed the accuracy of theaboveground biomass product and hence we considered it appropriate for further use in the carrying capacity assessment. A first assessment approach, which allowed for consumption of 65% of above ground biomass, resulted in an average carrying capacity of 12.6 sheep per ha. A second more realistic approach, which further restricted grazing on slopes steeper than 10%, resulted in a stocking density of 6.20 sheep per ha and a carrying capacity of 3.93 million sheep. Our analysis reveals overgrazing of the mountain grasslands because the current livestock population which consists of at least 8 million sheep, 0.5 million goats and an unknown number of cattle exceeds the predicted carrying capacity of 3.93 million sheep. We consider that the geographically explicit advice on sustainable stocking densities is particularly attractive to regulate grazing intensity in geographically varied terrain such as the mountain grasslands of Azerbaijan. We further conclude that the approach, given its generic nature and the free availability of most input data, could be replicated elsewhere. Hence, we advise considering its use where traditional carrying capacity assessments are difficult to implement.

AB - Remote sensing based grassland carrying capacity assessments are not commonly applied in rangeland management. Possible reasons for this include non-equilibrium thinking in rangeland management, and the costliness of existing remotely sensed biomass estimation that carrying capacity assessments require. Here, we present a less demanding approach for grassland biomass estimation using the MODIS Net Primary Production (NPP) product and demonstrate its use in carrying capacity assessment over the mountain grasslands of Azerbaijan.Based on publicly available estimates of the fraction of total NPP partitioned to above ground NPP (fANPP) we calculate the above ground biomass produced from 2005 to 2014. Validation of the predicted above ground biomass with independent field biomass data collected in 2007 and 2008 confirmed the accuracy of theaboveground biomass product and hence we considered it appropriate for further use in the carrying capacity assessment. A first assessment approach, which allowed for consumption of 65% of above ground biomass, resulted in an average carrying capacity of 12.6 sheep per ha. A second more realistic approach, which further restricted grazing on slopes steeper than 10%, resulted in a stocking density of 6.20 sheep per ha and a carrying capacity of 3.93 million sheep. Our analysis reveals overgrazing of the mountain grasslands because the current livestock population which consists of at least 8 million sheep, 0.5 million goats and an unknown number of cattle exceeds the predicted carrying capacity of 3.93 million sheep. We consider that the geographically explicit advice on sustainable stocking densities is particularly attractive to regulate grazing intensity in geographically varied terrain such as the mountain grasslands of Azerbaijan. We further conclude that the approach, given its generic nature and the free availability of most input data, could be replicated elsewhere. Hence, we advise considering its use where traditional carrying capacity assessments are difficult to implement.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jag.2018.09.014

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 66

EP - 76

JO - International Journal of applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

T2 - International Journal of applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

JF - International Journal of applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

SN - 0303-2434

ER -