Anticipating the future: 'Biotechnology for the poor' as unrealized promise?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses visions of the future articulated by proponents of `biotechnology for the poor¿, those who claim that an embrace of transgenic technology in agriculture is critical to alleviating poverty in developing countries. Specifically, we analyse how such `biotechnology for the poor¿ proponents represent a future with or without transgenic crops. Such representations include visions of a beckoning (promising) future, where much is to be gained from an embrace of transgenic technology in agriculture, and an onrushing (threatening) future, where much will be lost if the technology is not embraced. The article shows that claims about a beckoning or onrushing future by `biotechnology for the poor¿ proponents are based upon unexamined or problematic assumptions about the poor and poverty. As such, poverty becomes merely a moral backdrop against which visions of a future are articulated. Furthermore, `biotechnology for the poor¿ writings do not engage in dialogue with alternative voices in articulating their perspectives on the future, losing a key opportunity to democratize debate about this crucial issue. We conclude by considering the policy consequences (in regulatory and institutional terms) of `biotechnology for the poor¿ depictions of the future, particularly for the global South where such consequences will be felt
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)436-445
JournalFutures
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

biotechnology
poverty
agriculture
developing world
Biotechnology
crop
dialogue
developing country
Poverty
Agriculture

Keywords

  • developing-countries
  • agricultural biotechnology
  • crop biotechnology
  • gm crops
  • governance
  • revolution
  • biosafety
  • poverty
  • science
  • world

Cite this

@article{0031ea5e9817409b931f38924e3d5ee1,
title = "Anticipating the future: 'Biotechnology for the poor' as unrealized promise?",
abstract = "This article analyses visions of the future articulated by proponents of `biotechnology for the poor¿, those who claim that an embrace of transgenic technology in agriculture is critical to alleviating poverty in developing countries. Specifically, we analyse how such `biotechnology for the poor¿ proponents represent a future with or without transgenic crops. Such representations include visions of a beckoning (promising) future, where much is to be gained from an embrace of transgenic technology in agriculture, and an onrushing (threatening) future, where much will be lost if the technology is not embraced. The article shows that claims about a beckoning or onrushing future by `biotechnology for the poor¿ proponents are based upon unexamined or problematic assumptions about the poor and poverty. As such, poverty becomes merely a moral backdrop against which visions of a future are articulated. Furthermore, `biotechnology for the poor¿ writings do not engage in dialogue with alternative voices in articulating their perspectives on the future, losing a key opportunity to democratize debate about this crucial issue. We conclude by considering the policy consequences (in regulatory and institutional terms) of `biotechnology for the poor¿ depictions of the future, particularly for the global South where such consequences will be felt",
keywords = "developing-countries, agricultural biotechnology, crop biotechnology, gm crops, governance, revolution, biosafety, poverty, science, world",
author = "K. Jansen and A. Gupta",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.futures.2009.01.008",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "436--445",
journal = "Futures",
issn = "0016-3287",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "7",

}

Anticipating the future: 'Biotechnology for the poor' as unrealized promise? / Jansen, K.; Gupta, A.

In: Futures, Vol. 41, No. 7, 2009, p. 436-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anticipating the future: 'Biotechnology for the poor' as unrealized promise?

AU - Jansen, K.

AU - Gupta, A.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article analyses visions of the future articulated by proponents of `biotechnology for the poor¿, those who claim that an embrace of transgenic technology in agriculture is critical to alleviating poverty in developing countries. Specifically, we analyse how such `biotechnology for the poor¿ proponents represent a future with or without transgenic crops. Such representations include visions of a beckoning (promising) future, where much is to be gained from an embrace of transgenic technology in agriculture, and an onrushing (threatening) future, where much will be lost if the technology is not embraced. The article shows that claims about a beckoning or onrushing future by `biotechnology for the poor¿ proponents are based upon unexamined or problematic assumptions about the poor and poverty. As such, poverty becomes merely a moral backdrop against which visions of a future are articulated. Furthermore, `biotechnology for the poor¿ writings do not engage in dialogue with alternative voices in articulating their perspectives on the future, losing a key opportunity to democratize debate about this crucial issue. We conclude by considering the policy consequences (in regulatory and institutional terms) of `biotechnology for the poor¿ depictions of the future, particularly for the global South where such consequences will be felt

AB - This article analyses visions of the future articulated by proponents of `biotechnology for the poor¿, those who claim that an embrace of transgenic technology in agriculture is critical to alleviating poverty in developing countries. Specifically, we analyse how such `biotechnology for the poor¿ proponents represent a future with or without transgenic crops. Such representations include visions of a beckoning (promising) future, where much is to be gained from an embrace of transgenic technology in agriculture, and an onrushing (threatening) future, where much will be lost if the technology is not embraced. The article shows that claims about a beckoning or onrushing future by `biotechnology for the poor¿ proponents are based upon unexamined or problematic assumptions about the poor and poverty. As such, poverty becomes merely a moral backdrop against which visions of a future are articulated. Furthermore, `biotechnology for the poor¿ writings do not engage in dialogue with alternative voices in articulating their perspectives on the future, losing a key opportunity to democratize debate about this crucial issue. We conclude by considering the policy consequences (in regulatory and institutional terms) of `biotechnology for the poor¿ depictions of the future, particularly for the global South where such consequences will be felt

KW - developing-countries

KW - agricultural biotechnology

KW - crop biotechnology

KW - gm crops

KW - governance

KW - revolution

KW - biosafety

KW - poverty

KW - science

KW - world

U2 - 10.1016/j.futures.2009.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.futures.2009.01.008

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 436

EP - 445

JO - Futures

JF - Futures

SN - 0016-3287

IS - 7

ER -