An experiment in candidate selection

Katherine Casey*, Abou Bakarr Kamara*, Niccoló F. Meriggi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Are ordinary citizens or political party leaders better positioned to select candidates? While the American primary system lets citizens choose, most democracies rely instead on party officials to appoint or nominate candidates. The consequences of these distinct design choices are unclear: while officials are often better informed about candidate qualifications, they may value traits, like party loyalty or willingness to pay for the nomination, at odds with identifying the best performer. We partnered with both major political parties in Sierra Leone to experimentally vary how much say voters have in selecting Parliamentary candidates. Estimates suggest that more democratic procedures increase the likelihood that parties select voters' most preferred candidates and favor candidates with stronger records of public goods provision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1575-1612
Number of pages38
JournalAmerican Economic Review
Volume111
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An experiment in candidate selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this