An evolving science-society contract in India: The search for legitimacy in anticipatory risk governance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes evolving institutions and practices of anticipatory risk governance in India, through the lens of two recent and highly controversial developments in governing genetically modified crops in Indian agriculture. These developments include, first, conflicts over approving (or not) the very first genetically modified food crop in India and a related experiment in participatory decision-making; and second, proposals to revamp the existing biosafety regulatory system (with its checks and balances across diverse sources of authority) with one that elevates scientists and scientific expertise to the pinnacle of decision-making power. The article analyzes the distinct means by which legitimacy is sought to be conferred upon the means and ends of anticipatory risk governance, as reflected in these two examples. I contrast claims to legitimacy deriving from innovative experiments in participatory democracy with legitimacy claims based upon “objective” science, showing that despite acknowledged need for the former, the latter is still being prioritized. The article concludes by identifying the contours of an evolving science-society contract in India, as revealed by these cases
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)736-741
JournalFood Policy
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Illegitimacy
governance
Contracts
India
legitimacy
decision making
biosafety
crop
Decision Making
science
Genetically Modified Food
democracy
Democracy
genetically modified foods
experiment
food crops
Agriculture
Lens
agriculture
Lenses

Keywords

  • transparency

Cite this

@article{33d6c849e0d64cba9acc80eba4af37dd,
title = "An evolving science-society contract in India: The search for legitimacy in anticipatory risk governance",
abstract = "This article analyzes evolving institutions and practices of anticipatory risk governance in India, through the lens of two recent and highly controversial developments in governing genetically modified crops in Indian agriculture. These developments include, first, conflicts over approving (or not) the very first genetically modified food crop in India and a related experiment in participatory decision-making; and second, proposals to revamp the existing biosafety regulatory system (with its checks and balances across diverse sources of authority) with one that elevates scientists and scientific expertise to the pinnacle of decision-making power. The article analyzes the distinct means by which legitimacy is sought to be conferred upon the means and ends of anticipatory risk governance, as reflected in these two examples. I contrast claims to legitimacy deriving from innovative experiments in participatory democracy with legitimacy claims based upon “objective” science, showing that despite acknowledged need for the former, the latter is still being prioritized. The article concludes by identifying the contours of an evolving science-society contract in India, as revealed by these cases",
keywords = "transparency",
author = "A. Gupta",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.011",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "736--741",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

An evolving science-society contract in India: The search for legitimacy in anticipatory risk governance. / Gupta, A.

In: Food Policy, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2011, p. 736-741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evolving science-society contract in India: The search for legitimacy in anticipatory risk governance

AU - Gupta, A.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - This article analyzes evolving institutions and practices of anticipatory risk governance in India, through the lens of two recent and highly controversial developments in governing genetically modified crops in Indian agriculture. These developments include, first, conflicts over approving (or not) the very first genetically modified food crop in India and a related experiment in participatory decision-making; and second, proposals to revamp the existing biosafety regulatory system (with its checks and balances across diverse sources of authority) with one that elevates scientists and scientific expertise to the pinnacle of decision-making power. The article analyzes the distinct means by which legitimacy is sought to be conferred upon the means and ends of anticipatory risk governance, as reflected in these two examples. I contrast claims to legitimacy deriving from innovative experiments in participatory democracy with legitimacy claims based upon “objective” science, showing that despite acknowledged need for the former, the latter is still being prioritized. The article concludes by identifying the contours of an evolving science-society contract in India, as revealed by these cases

AB - This article analyzes evolving institutions and practices of anticipatory risk governance in India, through the lens of two recent and highly controversial developments in governing genetically modified crops in Indian agriculture. These developments include, first, conflicts over approving (or not) the very first genetically modified food crop in India and a related experiment in participatory decision-making; and second, proposals to revamp the existing biosafety regulatory system (with its checks and balances across diverse sources of authority) with one that elevates scientists and scientific expertise to the pinnacle of decision-making power. The article analyzes the distinct means by which legitimacy is sought to be conferred upon the means and ends of anticipatory risk governance, as reflected in these two examples. I contrast claims to legitimacy deriving from innovative experiments in participatory democracy with legitimacy claims based upon “objective” science, showing that despite acknowledged need for the former, the latter is still being prioritized. The article concludes by identifying the contours of an evolving science-society contract in India, as revealed by these cases

KW - transparency

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.011

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.07.011

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 736

EP - 741

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

IS - 6

ER -