An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces

Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This article investigates the links of the average consumer concept in secondary legislation and the Court’s case law, using doctrinal and empirical methods. It addresses five research questions: How is the average consumer test conceptualised? How does the CJEU test the average consumer? How is the average consumer characterized? Who decides who the average consumer is (institutional dimension?) Is the ‘average consumer’ in the UCPD case law the same ‘average consumer’ as elsewhere? To answer these questions, we first illustrate the relationship of the average consumer benchmark in secondary legislation to the Court’s case law. We show that out of all secondary legislation which explicitly uses the “average consumer” in its wording, jurisprudence has only dealt with the UCPD. We acknowledge that a large bulk of jurisprudence concerns the average consumer test in primary law or has been applied to interpret secondary legislation which does not make explicit reference to the consumer benchmark. However, we limit our analysis to cases where this clear link between the wording of secondary law and the Court’s jurisprudence exists, leaving aside the cases where the CJEU interpreted secondary legislation in light of primary law or primary law directly. Consequently, we investigate only the cases where the Court has operationalised the “average consumer” benchmark of the UCPD. Lastly, we summarize and analyse our findings
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Transformation of Economic Law
Subtitle of host publicationEssays in Honour of Hans-W. Micklitz
EditorsLucila de Almeida, Marta Cantero Gamito, Mateja Durovic, Kai Purnhagen
PublisherHart Publishing
Chapter2
Pages13-27
ISBN (Electronic)9781509932597
ISBN (Print)9781509932580, 9781509932603
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

court of justice
evidence
legislation
case law
jurisprudence
Law
empirical method

Cite this

Schebesta, H., & Purnhagen, K. (2019). An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces: Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD. In L. de Almeida, M. Cantero Gamito, M. Durovic, & K. Purnhagen (Eds.), The Transformation of Economic Law: Essays in Honour of Hans-W. Micklitz (pp. 13-27). Hart Publishing.
Schebesta, H. ; Purnhagen, K. / An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces : Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD. The Transformation of Economic Law: Essays in Honour of Hans-W. Micklitz. editor / Lucila de Almeida ; Marta Cantero Gamito ; Mateja Durovic ; Kai Purnhagen. Hart Publishing, 2019. pp. 13-27
@inbook{d9cc1a878d1347cdbc888db59e8a1a69,
title = "An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces: Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD",
abstract = "This article investigates the links of the average consumer concept in secondary legislation and the Court’s case law, using doctrinal and empirical methods. It addresses five research questions: How is the average consumer test conceptualised? How does the CJEU test the average consumer? How is the average consumer characterized? Who decides who the average consumer is (institutional dimension?) Is the ‘average consumer’ in the UCPD case law the same ‘average consumer’ as elsewhere? To answer these questions, we first illustrate the relationship of the average consumer benchmark in secondary legislation to the Court’s case law. We show that out of all secondary legislation which explicitly uses the “average consumer” in its wording, jurisprudence has only dealt with the UCPD. We acknowledge that a large bulk of jurisprudence concerns the average consumer test in primary law or has been applied to interpret secondary legislation which does not make explicit reference to the consumer benchmark. However, we limit our analysis to cases where this clear link between the wording of secondary law and the Court’s jurisprudence exists, leaving aside the cases where the CJEU interpreted secondary legislation in light of primary law or primary law directly. Consequently, we investigate only the cases where the Court has operationalised the “average consumer” benchmark of the UCPD. Lastly, we summarize and analyse our findings",
author = "H. Schebesta and K. Purnhagen",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "5",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781509932580",
pages = "13--27",
editor = "{de Almeida}, Lucila and {Cantero Gamito}, Marta and Mateja Durovic and Kai Purnhagen",
booktitle = "The Transformation of Economic Law",
publisher = "Hart Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Schebesta, H & Purnhagen, K 2019, An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces: Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD. in L de Almeida, M Cantero Gamito, M Durovic & K Purnhagen (eds), The Transformation of Economic Law: Essays in Honour of Hans-W. Micklitz. Hart Publishing, pp. 13-27.

An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces : Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD. / Schebesta, H.; Purnhagen, K.

The Transformation of Economic Law: Essays in Honour of Hans-W. Micklitz. ed. / Lucila de Almeida; Marta Cantero Gamito; Mateja Durovic; Kai Purnhagen. Hart Publishing, 2019. p. 13-27.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces

T2 - Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD

AU - Schebesta, H.

AU - Purnhagen, K.

PY - 2019/9/5

Y1 - 2019/9/5

N2 - This article investigates the links of the average consumer concept in secondary legislation and the Court’s case law, using doctrinal and empirical methods. It addresses five research questions: How is the average consumer test conceptualised? How does the CJEU test the average consumer? How is the average consumer characterized? Who decides who the average consumer is (institutional dimension?) Is the ‘average consumer’ in the UCPD case law the same ‘average consumer’ as elsewhere? To answer these questions, we first illustrate the relationship of the average consumer benchmark in secondary legislation to the Court’s case law. We show that out of all secondary legislation which explicitly uses the “average consumer” in its wording, jurisprudence has only dealt with the UCPD. We acknowledge that a large bulk of jurisprudence concerns the average consumer test in primary law or has been applied to interpret secondary legislation which does not make explicit reference to the consumer benchmark. However, we limit our analysis to cases where this clear link between the wording of secondary law and the Court’s jurisprudence exists, leaving aside the cases where the CJEU interpreted secondary legislation in light of primary law or primary law directly. Consequently, we investigate only the cases where the Court has operationalised the “average consumer” benchmark of the UCPD. Lastly, we summarize and analyse our findings

AB - This article investigates the links of the average consumer concept in secondary legislation and the Court’s case law, using doctrinal and empirical methods. It addresses five research questions: How is the average consumer test conceptualised? How does the CJEU test the average consumer? How is the average consumer characterized? Who decides who the average consumer is (institutional dimension?) Is the ‘average consumer’ in the UCPD case law the same ‘average consumer’ as elsewhere? To answer these questions, we first illustrate the relationship of the average consumer benchmark in secondary legislation to the Court’s case law. We show that out of all secondary legislation which explicitly uses the “average consumer” in its wording, jurisprudence has only dealt with the UCPD. We acknowledge that a large bulk of jurisprudence concerns the average consumer test in primary law or has been applied to interpret secondary legislation which does not make explicit reference to the consumer benchmark. However, we limit our analysis to cases where this clear link between the wording of secondary law and the Court’s jurisprudence exists, leaving aside the cases where the CJEU interpreted secondary legislation in light of primary law or primary law directly. Consequently, we investigate only the cases where the Court has operationalised the “average consumer” benchmark of the UCPD. Lastly, we summarize and analyse our findings

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781509932580

SN - 9781509932603

SP - 13

EP - 27

BT - The Transformation of Economic Law

A2 - de Almeida, Lucila

A2 - Cantero Gamito, Marta

A2 - Durovic, Mateja

A2 - Purnhagen, Kai

PB - Hart Publishing

ER -

Schebesta H, Purnhagen K. An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces: Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD. In de Almeida L, Cantero Gamito M, Durovic M, Purnhagen K, editors, The Transformation of Economic Law: Essays in Honour of Hans-W. Micklitz. Hart Publishing. 2019. p. 13-27