Allying knowledge integration and co-production for knowledge legitimacy and usability: The Amazonian SISA policy and the Kaxinawá Indigenous people case

Fernanda Ayaviri Matuk*, Esther Turnhout, Luuk Fleskens, Eufran Ferreira do Amaral, Moacir Haverroth, Jelle Hendrik Behagel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Environmental policies that aim to enhance nature conservation, biodiversity, and well-being of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLC) rely on knowledge integration and co-production processes that include both science and Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) systems. While these processes are expected to safeguard the diversity of knowledge systems, uneven power relations among participants often prevent them from achieving this which can affect the legitimacy and usability of the outcomes of these processes. Using a case study in the Acre state (Brazil), where policy practitioners implemented the REDD + policy System of Incentives for Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land, we investigate how participants manage challenges to safeguard knowledge diversity and usability during policy assessment and planning. Our findings show how, despite the use of participatory approaches, knowledge diversity ended up being compromised because policy practitioners were insufficiently attentive to power asymmetries and their implications. This, however, did not negatively affect the usability of the knowledge outcomes. Rather than focusing on the perfection of participatory methods, we call for a practical ethics that relies on culturally and ethically sensitive dialogues and that include continuous reflection. Such reflection will enable adaptation and improvisation to be able to respond to emerging power dynamics in an adequate and timely manner, thereby ensuring both the legitimacy and the usability of the outcomes of knowledge integration and co-production.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume112
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

Keywords

  • Adaptive co-management
  • Assessment
  • Environmental policy
  • Ethnoecology
  • Ethnopedology
  • Indigenous and Local Knowledge
  • Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities
  • Knowledge systems
  • Participation
  • REDD+
  • Science-policy interface
  • Transdisciplinarity

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Allying knowledge integration and co-production for knowledge legitimacy and usability: The Amazonian SISA policy and the Kaxinawá Indigenous people case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this