Aligning biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in spatial planning

Focus on ecosystem processes

Katrien Van der Biest*, Patrick Meire, Tim Schellekens, Bram D'hondt, Dries Bonte, Thomas Vanagt, Tom Ysebaert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Although the consideration of socio-economic demands with biodiversity conservation is now high on the environmental policy agenda, it is not yet standard practice in spatial planning. This is argued to be related, among others, to a lack of awareness among stakeholders and practitioners of the underpinning role of ecosystem functioning and biodiversity to support human well-being. Meanwhile, there is mounting critique on the absolute focus of biodiversity conservation on static properties such as species and habitats. The establishment of more ecologically sensible objectives that include ecosystem processes besides species and habitats is put forward as a more effective way of environmental conservation. Methodological approaches increasingly consider ecosystem processes. However, the processes that are included mostly relate to aspects of biodiversity such as dispersal and productivity, and rarely do they include abiotic mechanisms that underlie biodiversity. We here report on the development of a method that integrates two principles which we identify as key to advance the integration of ecosystem services with biodiversity conservation in planning practice: (1) consider the variety of ecosystem processes, biotic as well as abiotic, that support biodiversity and ecosystem services, and (2) link the ecosystem processes to biodiversity and to socio-economic benefits to identify the common ground between seemingly conflicting objectives. The methodology uses a stepwise approach and is based on an extensive review of available knowledge on ecosystem functioning, expert consultation and stakeholder involvement. We illustrate how the methodology supports the setting of strategic goals to accomplish a healthy coastal ecosystem in Belgium, and exemplify how this may affect spatial plans. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how including processes opens opportunities to align biodiversity and ecosystem services and how this increases chances to provide long-term benefits for biodiversity and human well-being. The paper may provide inspiration to advance current spatial planning approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Article number136350
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume712
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Apr 2020

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
spatial planning
ecosystem service
Ecosystems
Conservation
biodiversity
Planning
ecosystem
stakeholder
Economics
planning practice
methodology
habitat
Mountings
environmental policy
Productivity
productivity

Keywords

  • Ecosystem approach
  • Marine ecosystem
  • Natural dynamics
  • Stakeholders
  • Synergies, trade-offs

Cite this

Van der Biest, Katrien ; Meire, Patrick ; Schellekens, Tim ; D'hondt, Bram ; Bonte, Dries ; Vanagt, Thomas ; Ysebaert, Tom. / Aligning biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in spatial planning : Focus on ecosystem processes. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2020 ; Vol. 712.
@article{ac98df5ad97e40d1883da1dd55b0005e,
title = "Aligning biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in spatial planning: Focus on ecosystem processes",
abstract = "Although the consideration of socio-economic demands with biodiversity conservation is now high on the environmental policy agenda, it is not yet standard practice in spatial planning. This is argued to be related, among others, to a lack of awareness among stakeholders and practitioners of the underpinning role of ecosystem functioning and biodiversity to support human well-being. Meanwhile, there is mounting critique on the absolute focus of biodiversity conservation on static properties such as species and habitats. The establishment of more ecologically sensible objectives that include ecosystem processes besides species and habitats is put forward as a more effective way of environmental conservation. Methodological approaches increasingly consider ecosystem processes. However, the processes that are included mostly relate to aspects of biodiversity such as dispersal and productivity, and rarely do they include abiotic mechanisms that underlie biodiversity. We here report on the development of a method that integrates two principles which we identify as key to advance the integration of ecosystem services with biodiversity conservation in planning practice: (1) consider the variety of ecosystem processes, biotic as well as abiotic, that support biodiversity and ecosystem services, and (2) link the ecosystem processes to biodiversity and to socio-economic benefits to identify the common ground between seemingly conflicting objectives. The methodology uses a stepwise approach and is based on an extensive review of available knowledge on ecosystem functioning, expert consultation and stakeholder involvement. We illustrate how the methodology supports the setting of strategic goals to accomplish a healthy coastal ecosystem in Belgium, and exemplify how this may affect spatial plans. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how including processes opens opportunities to align biodiversity and ecosystem services and how this increases chances to provide long-term benefits for biodiversity and human well-being. The paper may provide inspiration to advance current spatial planning approaches.",
keywords = "Ecosystem approach, Marine ecosystem, Natural dynamics, Stakeholders, Synergies, trade-offs",
author = "{Van der Biest}, Katrien and Patrick Meire and Tim Schellekens and Bram D'hondt and Dries Bonte and Thomas Vanagt and Tom Ysebaert",
year = "2020",
month = "4",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136350",
language = "English",
volume = "712",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Aligning biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in spatial planning : Focus on ecosystem processes. / Van der Biest, Katrien; Meire, Patrick; Schellekens, Tim; D'hondt, Bram; Bonte, Dries; Vanagt, Thomas; Ysebaert, Tom.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 712, 136350, 10.04.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aligning biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services in spatial planning

T2 - Focus on ecosystem processes

AU - Van der Biest, Katrien

AU - Meire, Patrick

AU - Schellekens, Tim

AU - D'hondt, Bram

AU - Bonte, Dries

AU - Vanagt, Thomas

AU - Ysebaert, Tom

PY - 2020/4/10

Y1 - 2020/4/10

N2 - Although the consideration of socio-economic demands with biodiversity conservation is now high on the environmental policy agenda, it is not yet standard practice in spatial planning. This is argued to be related, among others, to a lack of awareness among stakeholders and practitioners of the underpinning role of ecosystem functioning and biodiversity to support human well-being. Meanwhile, there is mounting critique on the absolute focus of biodiversity conservation on static properties such as species and habitats. The establishment of more ecologically sensible objectives that include ecosystem processes besides species and habitats is put forward as a more effective way of environmental conservation. Methodological approaches increasingly consider ecosystem processes. However, the processes that are included mostly relate to aspects of biodiversity such as dispersal and productivity, and rarely do they include abiotic mechanisms that underlie biodiversity. We here report on the development of a method that integrates two principles which we identify as key to advance the integration of ecosystem services with biodiversity conservation in planning practice: (1) consider the variety of ecosystem processes, biotic as well as abiotic, that support biodiversity and ecosystem services, and (2) link the ecosystem processes to biodiversity and to socio-economic benefits to identify the common ground between seemingly conflicting objectives. The methodology uses a stepwise approach and is based on an extensive review of available knowledge on ecosystem functioning, expert consultation and stakeholder involvement. We illustrate how the methodology supports the setting of strategic goals to accomplish a healthy coastal ecosystem in Belgium, and exemplify how this may affect spatial plans. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how including processes opens opportunities to align biodiversity and ecosystem services and how this increases chances to provide long-term benefits for biodiversity and human well-being. The paper may provide inspiration to advance current spatial planning approaches.

AB - Although the consideration of socio-economic demands with biodiversity conservation is now high on the environmental policy agenda, it is not yet standard practice in spatial planning. This is argued to be related, among others, to a lack of awareness among stakeholders and practitioners of the underpinning role of ecosystem functioning and biodiversity to support human well-being. Meanwhile, there is mounting critique on the absolute focus of biodiversity conservation on static properties such as species and habitats. The establishment of more ecologically sensible objectives that include ecosystem processes besides species and habitats is put forward as a more effective way of environmental conservation. Methodological approaches increasingly consider ecosystem processes. However, the processes that are included mostly relate to aspects of biodiversity such as dispersal and productivity, and rarely do they include abiotic mechanisms that underlie biodiversity. We here report on the development of a method that integrates two principles which we identify as key to advance the integration of ecosystem services with biodiversity conservation in planning practice: (1) consider the variety of ecosystem processes, biotic as well as abiotic, that support biodiversity and ecosystem services, and (2) link the ecosystem processes to biodiversity and to socio-economic benefits to identify the common ground between seemingly conflicting objectives. The methodology uses a stepwise approach and is based on an extensive review of available knowledge on ecosystem functioning, expert consultation and stakeholder involvement. We illustrate how the methodology supports the setting of strategic goals to accomplish a healthy coastal ecosystem in Belgium, and exemplify how this may affect spatial plans. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how including processes opens opportunities to align biodiversity and ecosystem services and how this increases chances to provide long-term benefits for biodiversity and human well-being. The paper may provide inspiration to advance current spatial planning approaches.

KW - Ecosystem approach

KW - Marine ecosystem

KW - Natural dynamics

KW - Stakeholders

KW - Synergies, trade-offs

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136350

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136350

M3 - Article

VL - 712

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

M1 - 136350

ER -