Aid Relations and Aid Legitimacy: Mutual Imaging of Aid Workers and Recipients in Nepal

D. Hilhorst, L. Weijers, M. van Wessel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers mutual imaging of aid workers and Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. Based on a theoretical perspective of aid as a socially negotiated arena, the contextual and interactionist concept of imaging is used, rather than labelling (which is done to people), or perceptions (located in one actor's head). The paper uses a Q-methodology that symmetrically researches different groups of actors by posing the same questions. Our data confirm that the distinctions between the way aid workers and recipients view themselves, each other and the aid provided were more gradual than clear-cut between categories and that the legitimacy of aid workers is not determined by the perceived quality of aid. Problems with routinised aid were not translated into negative images, whereas problems with new and irregular types of aid were. Our research indicates the importance of the interaction between implementing staff and active beneficiaries. The roles of these active volunteers and incentive workers are important but ambiguous. They may smooth the divide between aid agencies and clients, but their proximity to the aid regime may also lead to tensions. The way these roles are played out and the effect this has on imaging and aid legitimacy is an area for further research
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1439-1457
JournalThird World Quarterly
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Nepal
aid
legitimacy
recipient
worker
aid agency
refugee
incentive
staff
methodology
interaction
Group

Keywords

  • humanitarian
  • organizations
  • arena
  • sudan
  • zone

Cite this

@article{5326d5ead1974a61a04c5f7dafd65a18,
title = "Aid Relations and Aid Legitimacy: Mutual Imaging of Aid Workers and Recipients in Nepal",
abstract = "This paper considers mutual imaging of aid workers and Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. Based on a theoretical perspective of aid as a socially negotiated arena, the contextual and interactionist concept of imaging is used, rather than labelling (which is done to people), or perceptions (located in one actor's head). The paper uses a Q-methodology that symmetrically researches different groups of actors by posing the same questions. Our data confirm that the distinctions between the way aid workers and recipients view themselves, each other and the aid provided were more gradual than clear-cut between categories and that the legitimacy of aid workers is not determined by the perceived quality of aid. Problems with routinised aid were not translated into negative images, whereas problems with new and irregular types of aid were. Our research indicates the importance of the interaction between implementing staff and active beneficiaries. The roles of these active volunteers and incentive workers are important but ambiguous. They may smooth the divide between aid agencies and clients, but their proximity to the aid regime may also lead to tensions. The way these roles are played out and the effect this has on imaging and aid legitimacy is an area for further research",
keywords = "humanitarian, organizations, arena, sudan, zone",
author = "D. Hilhorst and L. Weijers and {van Wessel}, M.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/01436597.2012.698126",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1439--1457",
journal = "Third World Quarterly",
issn = "0143-6597",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "8",

}

Aid Relations and Aid Legitimacy: Mutual Imaging of Aid Workers and Recipients in Nepal. / Hilhorst, D.; Weijers, L.; van Wessel, M.

In: Third World Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 8, 2012, p. 1439-1457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aid Relations and Aid Legitimacy: Mutual Imaging of Aid Workers and Recipients in Nepal

AU - Hilhorst, D.

AU - Weijers, L.

AU - van Wessel, M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper considers mutual imaging of aid workers and Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. Based on a theoretical perspective of aid as a socially negotiated arena, the contextual and interactionist concept of imaging is used, rather than labelling (which is done to people), or perceptions (located in one actor's head). The paper uses a Q-methodology that symmetrically researches different groups of actors by posing the same questions. Our data confirm that the distinctions between the way aid workers and recipients view themselves, each other and the aid provided were more gradual than clear-cut between categories and that the legitimacy of aid workers is not determined by the perceived quality of aid. Problems with routinised aid were not translated into negative images, whereas problems with new and irregular types of aid were. Our research indicates the importance of the interaction between implementing staff and active beneficiaries. The roles of these active volunteers and incentive workers are important but ambiguous. They may smooth the divide between aid agencies and clients, but their proximity to the aid regime may also lead to tensions. The way these roles are played out and the effect this has on imaging and aid legitimacy is an area for further research

AB - This paper considers mutual imaging of aid workers and Bhutanese refugees in Nepal. Based on a theoretical perspective of aid as a socially negotiated arena, the contextual and interactionist concept of imaging is used, rather than labelling (which is done to people), or perceptions (located in one actor's head). The paper uses a Q-methodology that symmetrically researches different groups of actors by posing the same questions. Our data confirm that the distinctions between the way aid workers and recipients view themselves, each other and the aid provided were more gradual than clear-cut between categories and that the legitimacy of aid workers is not determined by the perceived quality of aid. Problems with routinised aid were not translated into negative images, whereas problems with new and irregular types of aid were. Our research indicates the importance of the interaction between implementing staff and active beneficiaries. The roles of these active volunteers and incentive workers are important but ambiguous. They may smooth the divide between aid agencies and clients, but their proximity to the aid regime may also lead to tensions. The way these roles are played out and the effect this has on imaging and aid legitimacy is an area for further research

KW - humanitarian

KW - organizations

KW - arena

KW - sudan

KW - zone

U2 - 10.1080/01436597.2012.698126

DO - 10.1080/01436597.2012.698126

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1439

EP - 1457

JO - Third World Quarterly

JF - Third World Quarterly

SN - 0143-6597

IS - 8

ER -