Adoption of innovation in agriculture: a critical review of economic and psychological models

J.A. Rossi Borges, A.G.J.M. Oude Lansink, Grigorios Emvalomatis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Two main models have been used to analyse farmers’ decisions to
adopt an innovation; the first is based on the concept of utility maximisation
(UM) and the second is based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). This
study uses a vote-count method to identify the effect of different variables on
farmers’ adoption decisions in 36 studies using either UM or the TPB. Results
from the UM studies show that the explanatory variables mostly have an
insignificant effect on the adoption decision. When the effects are significant,
the sign of the effect is inconsistent across studies. Results from the TPB
studies show that correlations between the psychological constructs used in this
type of model are significant in most cases. However, most variables are only
used in one or two studies and it is therefore not
LanguageEnglish
Pages36-56
JournalInternational Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Agriculture
Innovation
Economics
Adoption of innovations
Psychological
Utility maximization
Theory of planned behavior

Cite this

@article{56ed84380f604af191ae1fb90d08d981,
title = "Adoption of innovation in agriculture: a critical review of economic and psychological models",
abstract = "Two main models have been used to analyse farmers’ decisions toadopt an innovation; the first is based on the concept of utility maximisation(UM) and the second is based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Thisstudy uses a vote-count method to identify the effect of different variables onfarmers’ adoption decisions in 36 studies using either UM or the TPB. Resultsfrom the UM studies show that the explanatory variables mostly have aninsignificant effect on the adoption decision. When the effects are significant,the sign of the effect is inconsistent across studies. Results from the TPBstudies show that correlations between the psychological constructs used in thistype of model are significant in most cases. However, most variables are onlyused in one or two studies and it is therefore not",
author = "{Rossi Borges}, J.A. and {Oude Lansink}, A.G.J.M. and Grigorios Emvalomatis",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1504/IJISD.2019.10017237",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "36--56",
journal = "International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development",
issn = "1740-8822",
publisher = "Inderscience",
number = "1",

}

Adoption of innovation in agriculture: a critical review of economic and psychological models. / Rossi Borges, J.A.; Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M.; Emvalomatis, Grigorios .

In: International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2019, p. 36-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adoption of innovation in agriculture: a critical review of economic and psychological models

AU - Rossi Borges, J.A.

AU - Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M.

AU - Emvalomatis, Grigorios

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Two main models have been used to analyse farmers’ decisions toadopt an innovation; the first is based on the concept of utility maximisation(UM) and the second is based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Thisstudy uses a vote-count method to identify the effect of different variables onfarmers’ adoption decisions in 36 studies using either UM or the TPB. Resultsfrom the UM studies show that the explanatory variables mostly have aninsignificant effect on the adoption decision. When the effects are significant,the sign of the effect is inconsistent across studies. Results from the TPBstudies show that correlations between the psychological constructs used in thistype of model are significant in most cases. However, most variables are onlyused in one or two studies and it is therefore not

AB - Two main models have been used to analyse farmers’ decisions toadopt an innovation; the first is based on the concept of utility maximisation(UM) and the second is based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Thisstudy uses a vote-count method to identify the effect of different variables onfarmers’ adoption decisions in 36 studies using either UM or the TPB. Resultsfrom the UM studies show that the explanatory variables mostly have aninsignificant effect on the adoption decision. When the effects are significant,the sign of the effect is inconsistent across studies. Results from the TPBstudies show that correlations between the psychological constructs used in thistype of model are significant in most cases. However, most variables are onlyused in one or two studies and it is therefore not

U2 - 10.1504/IJISD.2019.10017237

DO - 10.1504/IJISD.2019.10017237

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 36

EP - 56

JO - International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development

T2 - International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development

JF - International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development

SN - 1740-8822

IS - 1

ER -