Adapting scenarios for climate adaptation: Practitioners’ perspectives on a popular planning method

James R.A. Butler*, Anne Marte Bergseng, Erin Bohensky, Simona Pedde, Matt Aitkenhead, Rohan Hamden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Scenario planning is a popular decision-support method that is increasingly being applied to climate change adaptation. However, evaluation of scenario planning for adaptation is lacking. In this paper we summarise a science-policy session held at the European Climate Change Adaptation Conference in May 2019, where practitioners explored the strengths and weaknesses of scenario planning for climate adaptation and identified modifications to enhance the method's utility. Eight case studies spanning three scenario planning types (problem-focused, actor-focused and reflexive-interventionist) from varied socio-cultural contexts were presented by the authors, followed by discussion amongst the 40 participants. Strengths focussed on opportunities provided by scenario planning for stakeholder participation, and raising their awareness about future risks, vulnerability and uncertainty. Participatory scenario planning was most useful for building stakeholder consensus at the local scale (e.g. communities, neighbourhoods) over shorter timeframes (e.g. 20 years). Weaknesses centred on the inability of scenarios to generate quantitative predictions and concrete adaptation solutions. This was partly attributed to practitioners’ limited understanding of stakeholder politics and power dynamics, and the resulting lack of integration of scenario exercises within decision-making processes. Scenarios were also limited by being static, and participatory processes were resource-intensive. Suggested modifications were to develop iterative scenario planning embedded within decision-making cycles. Such ‘transient scenarios’ could absorb system feedbacks and updated information to prioritise adaptation responses, thus actively contributing to ongoing adaptation pathways. Applying monitoring, evaluating and learning would enable reflexive refinement of the method, adapting it to become an agile approach applicable to varied socio-cultural and political contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-19
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume104
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2020

Fingerprint

planning method
planning methods
climate
scenario
planning
stakeholder
decision making
climate change
willingness to integrate
vulnerability
politics
learning
science policy
decision-making process
monitoring
resource
prediction

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Climate change
  • Decision-making
  • Futures
  • Participation
  • Politics

Cite this

Butler, James R.A. ; Bergseng, Anne Marte ; Bohensky, Erin ; Pedde, Simona ; Aitkenhead, Matt ; Hamden, Rohan. / Adapting scenarios for climate adaptation: Practitioners’ perspectives on a popular planning method. In: Environmental Science and Policy. 2020 ; Vol. 104. pp. 13-19.
@article{907d513c59394a6ea51803fbe73c7604,
title = "Adapting scenarios for climate adaptation: Practitioners’ perspectives on a popular planning method",
abstract = "Scenario planning is a popular decision-support method that is increasingly being applied to climate change adaptation. However, evaluation of scenario planning for adaptation is lacking. In this paper we summarise a science-policy session held at the European Climate Change Adaptation Conference in May 2019, where practitioners explored the strengths and weaknesses of scenario planning for climate adaptation and identified modifications to enhance the method's utility. Eight case studies spanning three scenario planning types (problem-focused, actor-focused and reflexive-interventionist) from varied socio-cultural contexts were presented by the authors, followed by discussion amongst the 40 participants. Strengths focussed on opportunities provided by scenario planning for stakeholder participation, and raising their awareness about future risks, vulnerability and uncertainty. Participatory scenario planning was most useful for building stakeholder consensus at the local scale (e.g. communities, neighbourhoods) over shorter timeframes (e.g. 20 years). Weaknesses centred on the inability of scenarios to generate quantitative predictions and concrete adaptation solutions. This was partly attributed to practitioners’ limited understanding of stakeholder politics and power dynamics, and the resulting lack of integration of scenario exercises within decision-making processes. Scenarios were also limited by being static, and participatory processes were resource-intensive. Suggested modifications were to develop iterative scenario planning embedded within decision-making cycles. Such ‘transient scenarios’ could absorb system feedbacks and updated information to prioritise adaptation responses, thus actively contributing to ongoing adaptation pathways. Applying monitoring, evaluating and learning would enable reflexive refinement of the method, adapting it to become an agile approach applicable to varied socio-cultural and political contexts.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Climate change, Decision-making, Futures, Participation, Politics",
author = "Butler, {James R.A.} and Bergseng, {Anne Marte} and Erin Bohensky and Simona Pedde and Matt Aitkenhead and Rohan Hamden",
year = "2020",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.014",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "13--19",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Adapting scenarios for climate adaptation: Practitioners’ perspectives on a popular planning method. / Butler, James R.A.; Bergseng, Anne Marte; Bohensky, Erin; Pedde, Simona; Aitkenhead, Matt; Hamden, Rohan.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 104, 01.02.2020, p. 13-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adapting scenarios for climate adaptation: Practitioners’ perspectives on a popular planning method

AU - Butler, James R.A.

AU - Bergseng, Anne Marte

AU - Bohensky, Erin

AU - Pedde, Simona

AU - Aitkenhead, Matt

AU - Hamden, Rohan

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - Scenario planning is a popular decision-support method that is increasingly being applied to climate change adaptation. However, evaluation of scenario planning for adaptation is lacking. In this paper we summarise a science-policy session held at the European Climate Change Adaptation Conference in May 2019, where practitioners explored the strengths and weaknesses of scenario planning for climate adaptation and identified modifications to enhance the method's utility. Eight case studies spanning three scenario planning types (problem-focused, actor-focused and reflexive-interventionist) from varied socio-cultural contexts were presented by the authors, followed by discussion amongst the 40 participants. Strengths focussed on opportunities provided by scenario planning for stakeholder participation, and raising their awareness about future risks, vulnerability and uncertainty. Participatory scenario planning was most useful for building stakeholder consensus at the local scale (e.g. communities, neighbourhoods) over shorter timeframes (e.g. 20 years). Weaknesses centred on the inability of scenarios to generate quantitative predictions and concrete adaptation solutions. This was partly attributed to practitioners’ limited understanding of stakeholder politics and power dynamics, and the resulting lack of integration of scenario exercises within decision-making processes. Scenarios were also limited by being static, and participatory processes were resource-intensive. Suggested modifications were to develop iterative scenario planning embedded within decision-making cycles. Such ‘transient scenarios’ could absorb system feedbacks and updated information to prioritise adaptation responses, thus actively contributing to ongoing adaptation pathways. Applying monitoring, evaluating and learning would enable reflexive refinement of the method, adapting it to become an agile approach applicable to varied socio-cultural and political contexts.

AB - Scenario planning is a popular decision-support method that is increasingly being applied to climate change adaptation. However, evaluation of scenario planning for adaptation is lacking. In this paper we summarise a science-policy session held at the European Climate Change Adaptation Conference in May 2019, where practitioners explored the strengths and weaknesses of scenario planning for climate adaptation and identified modifications to enhance the method's utility. Eight case studies spanning three scenario planning types (problem-focused, actor-focused and reflexive-interventionist) from varied socio-cultural contexts were presented by the authors, followed by discussion amongst the 40 participants. Strengths focussed on opportunities provided by scenario planning for stakeholder participation, and raising their awareness about future risks, vulnerability and uncertainty. Participatory scenario planning was most useful for building stakeholder consensus at the local scale (e.g. communities, neighbourhoods) over shorter timeframes (e.g. 20 years). Weaknesses centred on the inability of scenarios to generate quantitative predictions and concrete adaptation solutions. This was partly attributed to practitioners’ limited understanding of stakeholder politics and power dynamics, and the resulting lack of integration of scenario exercises within decision-making processes. Scenarios were also limited by being static, and participatory processes were resource-intensive. Suggested modifications were to develop iterative scenario planning embedded within decision-making cycles. Such ‘transient scenarios’ could absorb system feedbacks and updated information to prioritise adaptation responses, thus actively contributing to ongoing adaptation pathways. Applying monitoring, evaluating and learning would enable reflexive refinement of the method, adapting it to become an agile approach applicable to varied socio-cultural and political contexts.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Climate change

KW - Decision-making

KW - Futures

KW - Participation

KW - Politics

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.014

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.014

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 13

EP - 19

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -