Adaptation science for agricultural and natural resource management – Urgency and theoretical basis

H.B. Meinke, S.M. Howden, P.C. Struik, R. Nelson, D. Rodriguez, S.C. Chapman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The urgency for adaptation actions in response to climate risks is rapidly growing and climate change mitigation efforts alone are insufficient to avoid further, and often negative, impacts. Although most agricultural producers respond rapidly to changes in their external environment, science needs to play an important, partial role in instigating adaptation actions that go beyond the ongoing, experience-based response process. This requires well-structured, conceptual frameworks that connect science with action. These frameworks must also ensure that the scientific input into the adaptation process remains salient, credible and legitimate. For the field of agriculture and environmental sciences we review the urgency and the theoretical basis for such engagement processes. On the basis of this we propose an adaptation cycle that first, provides a reflective analysis-action continuum; second, ensures broad-based scientific input and feedback; and third, helps to increase the adaptive capacity of everyone involved (including farmers, policy-makers and scientists).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-76
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

natural resources
resource management
natural resource
science
management
conceptual framework
producer
farmer
climate change
agriculture
climate
experience

Keywords

  • australian drought policy
  • incomes-transforming advice
  • climate-change
  • farm incomes
  • knowledge
  • support
  • systems
  • variability
  • resilience
  • framework

Cite this

Meinke, H.B. ; Howden, S.M. ; Struik, P.C. ; Nelson, R. ; Rodriguez, D. ; Chapman, S.C. / Adaptation science for agricultural and natural resource management – Urgency and theoretical basis. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2009 ; Vol. 1, No. 1. pp. 69-76.
@article{c251570493064b8cb72fc900f218a780,
title = "Adaptation science for agricultural and natural resource management – Urgency and theoretical basis",
abstract = "The urgency for adaptation actions in response to climate risks is rapidly growing and climate change mitigation efforts alone are insufficient to avoid further, and often negative, impacts. Although most agricultural producers respond rapidly to changes in their external environment, science needs to play an important, partial role in instigating adaptation actions that go beyond the ongoing, experience-based response process. This requires well-structured, conceptual frameworks that connect science with action. These frameworks must also ensure that the scientific input into the adaptation process remains salient, credible and legitimate. For the field of agriculture and environmental sciences we review the urgency and the theoretical basis for such engagement processes. On the basis of this we propose an adaptation cycle that first, provides a reflective analysis-action continuum; second, ensures broad-based scientific input and feedback; and third, helps to increase the adaptive capacity of everyone involved (including farmers, policy-makers and scientists).",
keywords = "australian drought policy, incomes-transforming advice, climate-change, farm incomes, knowledge, support, systems, variability, resilience, framework",
author = "H.B. Meinke and S.M. Howden and P.C. Struik and R. Nelson and D. Rodriguez and S.C. Chapman",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.007",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "69--76",
journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",
issn = "1877-3435",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Adaptation science for agricultural and natural resource management – Urgency and theoretical basis. / Meinke, H.B.; Howden, S.M.; Struik, P.C.; Nelson, R.; Rodriguez, D.; Chapman, S.C.

In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, p. 69-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Adaptation science for agricultural and natural resource management – Urgency and theoretical basis

AU - Meinke, H.B.

AU - Howden, S.M.

AU - Struik, P.C.

AU - Nelson, R.

AU - Rodriguez, D.

AU - Chapman, S.C.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The urgency for adaptation actions in response to climate risks is rapidly growing and climate change mitigation efforts alone are insufficient to avoid further, and often negative, impacts. Although most agricultural producers respond rapidly to changes in their external environment, science needs to play an important, partial role in instigating adaptation actions that go beyond the ongoing, experience-based response process. This requires well-structured, conceptual frameworks that connect science with action. These frameworks must also ensure that the scientific input into the adaptation process remains salient, credible and legitimate. For the field of agriculture and environmental sciences we review the urgency and the theoretical basis for such engagement processes. On the basis of this we propose an adaptation cycle that first, provides a reflective analysis-action continuum; second, ensures broad-based scientific input and feedback; and third, helps to increase the adaptive capacity of everyone involved (including farmers, policy-makers and scientists).

AB - The urgency for adaptation actions in response to climate risks is rapidly growing and climate change mitigation efforts alone are insufficient to avoid further, and often negative, impacts. Although most agricultural producers respond rapidly to changes in their external environment, science needs to play an important, partial role in instigating adaptation actions that go beyond the ongoing, experience-based response process. This requires well-structured, conceptual frameworks that connect science with action. These frameworks must also ensure that the scientific input into the adaptation process remains salient, credible and legitimate. For the field of agriculture and environmental sciences we review the urgency and the theoretical basis for such engagement processes. On the basis of this we propose an adaptation cycle that first, provides a reflective analysis-action continuum; second, ensures broad-based scientific input and feedback; and third, helps to increase the adaptive capacity of everyone involved (including farmers, policy-makers and scientists).

KW - australian drought policy

KW - incomes-transforming advice

KW - climate-change

KW - farm incomes

KW - knowledge

KW - support

KW - systems

KW - variability

KW - resilience

KW - framework

U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.07.007

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 69

EP - 76

JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

SN - 1877-3435

IS - 1

ER -