Actionable Knowledge and Strategic Decision-Making Related to Bio- and Agroterrorism Threats: Educational Needs on How to Build a Collaborative Early-Warning Culture

P.A. Martensson, L. Hedström, B. Sundelius, J. Skiby, A.R.W. Elbers, R. Knutsson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current trends in biosecurity and cybersecurity include (1) the wide availability of technology and specialized knowledge that previously were available only to governments; (2) the global economic recession, which may increase the spread of radical non-state actors; and (3) recent US and EU commission reports that reflect concerns about non-state actors in asymmetric threats. The intersectoral and international nature of bioterrorism and agroterrorism threats requires collaboration across several sectors including intelligence, police, forensics, customs, and other law enforcement organizations who must work together with public and animal health organizations as well as environmental and social science organizations. This requires coordinated decision making among these organizations, based on actionable knowledge and information sharing. The risk of not sharing information among organizations compared to the benefit of sharing information can be considered in an “information sharing risk-benefit analysis” to prevent a terrorism incident from occurring and to build a rapid response capability. In the EU project AniBioThreat, early warning is the main topic in work package 3 (WP 3). A strategy has been generated based on an iterative approach to bring law enforcement agencies and human and animal health institutes together. Workshops and exercises have taken place during the first half of the project, and spin-off activities include new preparedness plans for institutes and the formation of a legal adviser network for decision making. In addition, a seminar on actionable knowledge was held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2012, which identified the need to bring various agency cultures together to work on developing a resilient capability to identify early signs of bio- and agroterrorism threats. The seminar concluded that there are a number of challenges in building a collaborative culture, including developing an education program that supports collaboration and shared situational awareness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S46-S54
JournalBiosecurity and Bioterrorism: biodefense strategy, practice and science
Volume11
Issue numberSuppl. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Information Dissemination
Decision Making
decision making
Organizations
threat
law enforcement
Law Enforcement
bioterrorism
Economic Recession
EU
animal
terrorism
spin-off
Terrorism
Bioterrorism
Computer Security
Education
Social Sciences
public health
Police

Keywords

  • surveillance
  • diseases
  • bioterrorism

Cite this

@article{989852a9f43b4ab9aa1b7a4c0779d38e,
title = "Actionable Knowledge and Strategic Decision-Making Related to Bio- and Agroterrorism Threats: Educational Needs on How to Build a Collaborative Early-Warning Culture",
abstract = "Current trends in biosecurity and cybersecurity include (1) the wide availability of technology and specialized knowledge that previously were available only to governments; (2) the global economic recession, which may increase the spread of radical non-state actors; and (3) recent US and EU commission reports that reflect concerns about non-state actors in asymmetric threats. The intersectoral and international nature of bioterrorism and agroterrorism threats requires collaboration across several sectors including intelligence, police, forensics, customs, and other law enforcement organizations who must work together with public and animal health organizations as well as environmental and social science organizations. This requires coordinated decision making among these organizations, based on actionable knowledge and information sharing. The risk of not sharing information among organizations compared to the benefit of sharing information can be considered in an “information sharing risk-benefit analysis” to prevent a terrorism incident from occurring and to build a rapid response capability. In the EU project AniBioThreat, early warning is the main topic in work package 3 (WP 3). A strategy has been generated based on an iterative approach to bring law enforcement agencies and human and animal health institutes together. Workshops and exercises have taken place during the first half of the project, and spin-off activities include new preparedness plans for institutes and the formation of a legal adviser network for decision making. In addition, a seminar on actionable knowledge was held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2012, which identified the need to bring various agency cultures together to work on developing a resilient capability to identify early signs of bio- and agroterrorism threats. The seminar concluded that there are a number of challenges in building a collaborative culture, including developing an education program that supports collaboration and shared situational awareness.",
keywords = "surveillance, diseases, bioterrorism",
author = "P.A. Martensson and L. Hedstr{\"o}m and B. Sundelius and J. Skiby and A.R.W. Elbers and R. Knutsson",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1089/bsp.2013.0039",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "S46--S54",
journal = "Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: biodefense strategy, practice and science",
issn = "1538-7135",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert",
number = "Suppl. 1",

}

Actionable Knowledge and Strategic Decision-Making Related to Bio- and Agroterrorism Threats: Educational Needs on How to Build a Collaborative Early-Warning Culture. / Martensson, P.A.; Hedström, L.; Sundelius, B.; Skiby, J.; Elbers, A.R.W.; Knutsson, R.

In: Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: biodefense strategy, practice and science, Vol. 11, No. Suppl. 1, 2013, p. S46-S54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Actionable Knowledge and Strategic Decision-Making Related to Bio- and Agroterrorism Threats: Educational Needs on How to Build a Collaborative Early-Warning Culture

AU - Martensson, P.A.

AU - Hedström, L.

AU - Sundelius, B.

AU - Skiby, J.

AU - Elbers, A.R.W.

AU - Knutsson, R.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Current trends in biosecurity and cybersecurity include (1) the wide availability of technology and specialized knowledge that previously were available only to governments; (2) the global economic recession, which may increase the spread of radical non-state actors; and (3) recent US and EU commission reports that reflect concerns about non-state actors in asymmetric threats. The intersectoral and international nature of bioterrorism and agroterrorism threats requires collaboration across several sectors including intelligence, police, forensics, customs, and other law enforcement organizations who must work together with public and animal health organizations as well as environmental and social science organizations. This requires coordinated decision making among these organizations, based on actionable knowledge and information sharing. The risk of not sharing information among organizations compared to the benefit of sharing information can be considered in an “information sharing risk-benefit analysis” to prevent a terrorism incident from occurring and to build a rapid response capability. In the EU project AniBioThreat, early warning is the main topic in work package 3 (WP 3). A strategy has been generated based on an iterative approach to bring law enforcement agencies and human and animal health institutes together. Workshops and exercises have taken place during the first half of the project, and spin-off activities include new preparedness plans for institutes and the formation of a legal adviser network for decision making. In addition, a seminar on actionable knowledge was held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2012, which identified the need to bring various agency cultures together to work on developing a resilient capability to identify early signs of bio- and agroterrorism threats. The seminar concluded that there are a number of challenges in building a collaborative culture, including developing an education program that supports collaboration and shared situational awareness.

AB - Current trends in biosecurity and cybersecurity include (1) the wide availability of technology and specialized knowledge that previously were available only to governments; (2) the global economic recession, which may increase the spread of radical non-state actors; and (3) recent US and EU commission reports that reflect concerns about non-state actors in asymmetric threats. The intersectoral and international nature of bioterrorism and agroterrorism threats requires collaboration across several sectors including intelligence, police, forensics, customs, and other law enforcement organizations who must work together with public and animal health organizations as well as environmental and social science organizations. This requires coordinated decision making among these organizations, based on actionable knowledge and information sharing. The risk of not sharing information among organizations compared to the benefit of sharing information can be considered in an “information sharing risk-benefit analysis” to prevent a terrorism incident from occurring and to build a rapid response capability. In the EU project AniBioThreat, early warning is the main topic in work package 3 (WP 3). A strategy has been generated based on an iterative approach to bring law enforcement agencies and human and animal health institutes together. Workshops and exercises have taken place during the first half of the project, and spin-off activities include new preparedness plans for institutes and the formation of a legal adviser network for decision making. In addition, a seminar on actionable knowledge was held in Stockholm, Sweden, in 2012, which identified the need to bring various agency cultures together to work on developing a resilient capability to identify early signs of bio- and agroterrorism threats. The seminar concluded that there are a number of challenges in building a collaborative culture, including developing an education program that supports collaboration and shared situational awareness.

KW - surveillance

KW - diseases

KW - bioterrorism

U2 - 10.1089/bsp.2013.0039

DO - 10.1089/bsp.2013.0039

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - S46-S54

JO - Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: biodefense strategy, practice and science

JF - Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: biodefense strategy, practice and science

SN - 1538-7135

IS - Suppl. 1

ER -