Research output per year
Research output per year
Brian C. O’Neill*, Timothy R. Carter, Kristie Ebi, Paula A. Harrison, Eric Kemp-Benedict, Kasper Kok, Elmar Kriegler, Benjamin L. Preston, Keywan Riahi, Jana Sillmann, Bas J. van Ruijven, Detlef van Vuuren, David Carlisle, Cecilia Conde, Jan Fuglestvedt, Carole Green, Tomoko Hasegawa, Julia Leininger, Seth Monteith, Ramon Pichs-Madruga
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
Long-term global scenarios have underpinned research and assessment of global environmental change for four decades. Over the past ten years, the climate change research community has developed a scenario framework combining alternative futures of climate and society to facilitate integrated research and consistent assessment to inform policy. Here we assess how well this framework is working and what challenges it faces. We synthesize insights from scenario-based literature, community discussions and recent experience in assessments, concluding that the framework has been widely adopted across research communities and is largely meeting immediate needs. However, some mixed successes and a changing policy and research landscape present key challenges, and we recommend several new directions for the development and use of this framework.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1074-1084 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Nature Climate Change |
Volume | 10 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2020 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic
1/09/19 → 31/12/23
Project: EU research project
1/09/15 → 30/09/19
Project: EU research project