Acceptability of Lethal Control of Wildlife that Damage Agriculture in the Netherlands

M.T.J. Sijtsma, J.J. Vaske, M.H. Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of lethal control of wildlife is controversial. We examined the acceptability of using lethal control to minimize the impacts of geese and deer on agricultural crops in the Netherlands. Two sets of predictors were examined: wildlife value orientations (WVOs) and demographics. The two wildlife value orientations—domination and mutualism—were based on prior theorizing and research in the United States. Demographic variables included age, gender, education, and current residence. We used data from a mailed survey (n = 353) sent to randomly selected individuals in the Netherlands. We examined six separate logistic regression models. As predicted, only the value orientations were statistically significant, accounting for 39% (geese) and 37% (deer) of the variance. Of the two WVOs, domination was a better predictor of acceptability ratings than mutualism. Results suggest that WVOs have predictive validity outside the United States.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1308-1323
JournalSociety & Natural Resources
Volume25
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

value-orientation
damages
Netherlands
agriculture
damage
deer
domination
mutualism
rating
logistics
gender
regression
wildlife
education
crop
Values

Keywords

  • management actions
  • value orientations
  • united-states
  • canada geese
  • deer
  • attitudes
  • beliefs

Cite this

@article{43dc012c39494b079b902e951a129e99,
title = "Acceptability of Lethal Control of Wildlife that Damage Agriculture in the Netherlands",
abstract = "The use of lethal control of wildlife is controversial. We examined the acceptability of using lethal control to minimize the impacts of geese and deer on agricultural crops in the Netherlands. Two sets of predictors were examined: wildlife value orientations (WVOs) and demographics. The two wildlife value orientations—domination and mutualism—were based on prior theorizing and research in the United States. Demographic variables included age, gender, education, and current residence. We used data from a mailed survey (n = 353) sent to randomly selected individuals in the Netherlands. We examined six separate logistic regression models. As predicted, only the value orientations were statistically significant, accounting for 39{\%} (geese) and 37{\%} (deer) of the variance. Of the two WVOs, domination was a better predictor of acceptability ratings than mutualism. Results suggest that WVOs have predictive validity outside the United States.",
keywords = "management actions, value orientations, united-states, canada geese, deer, attitudes, beliefs",
author = "M.T.J. Sijtsma and J.J. Vaske and M.H. Jacobs",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/08941920.2012.684850",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1308--1323",
journal = "Society & Natural Resources",
issn = "0894-1920",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "12",

}

Acceptability of Lethal Control of Wildlife that Damage Agriculture in the Netherlands. / Sijtsma, M.T.J.; Vaske, J.J.; Jacobs, M.H.

In: Society & Natural Resources, Vol. 25, No. 12, 2012, p. 1308-1323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Acceptability of Lethal Control of Wildlife that Damage Agriculture in the Netherlands

AU - Sijtsma, M.T.J.

AU - Vaske, J.J.

AU - Jacobs, M.H.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The use of lethal control of wildlife is controversial. We examined the acceptability of using lethal control to minimize the impacts of geese and deer on agricultural crops in the Netherlands. Two sets of predictors were examined: wildlife value orientations (WVOs) and demographics. The two wildlife value orientations—domination and mutualism—were based on prior theorizing and research in the United States. Demographic variables included age, gender, education, and current residence. We used data from a mailed survey (n = 353) sent to randomly selected individuals in the Netherlands. We examined six separate logistic regression models. As predicted, only the value orientations were statistically significant, accounting for 39% (geese) and 37% (deer) of the variance. Of the two WVOs, domination was a better predictor of acceptability ratings than mutualism. Results suggest that WVOs have predictive validity outside the United States.

AB - The use of lethal control of wildlife is controversial. We examined the acceptability of using lethal control to minimize the impacts of geese and deer on agricultural crops in the Netherlands. Two sets of predictors were examined: wildlife value orientations (WVOs) and demographics. The two wildlife value orientations—domination and mutualism—were based on prior theorizing and research in the United States. Demographic variables included age, gender, education, and current residence. We used data from a mailed survey (n = 353) sent to randomly selected individuals in the Netherlands. We examined six separate logistic regression models. As predicted, only the value orientations were statistically significant, accounting for 39% (geese) and 37% (deer) of the variance. Of the two WVOs, domination was a better predictor of acceptability ratings than mutualism. Results suggest that WVOs have predictive validity outside the United States.

KW - management actions

KW - value orientations

KW - united-states

KW - canada geese

KW - deer

KW - attitudes

KW - beliefs

U2 - 10.1080/08941920.2012.684850

DO - 10.1080/08941920.2012.684850

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1308

EP - 1323

JO - Society & Natural Resources

JF - Society & Natural Resources

SN - 0894-1920

IS - 12

ER -