Acacia: the case against moving the type to Australia

M. Luckow, H. Colin, B. Chriri, P. Winter, C. Fagg, R. Fortunato, J. Hurter, L. Rico, F.J. Breteler, A. Bruneau, M. Caccavari, L. Graven, M. Crisp, J.J. Wieringa, L.J.G. van der Maesen, A. Delgado, S. Demissew, J. Doyle, R. Grether, S. HarrisP. Herendeen, H. Hernandez, A.M. Hirsch, R. Jobson, B.B. Klitgaard, J.N. Labat, M. Lock, B. Mackinder, B. Pfeil, B.B. Simpson, G.F. Smith, M. de Sousa, J. Timberlake, A.E. van Wijk, P. Vorster, K.J. Willis, M.F. Wojciechowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that Acacia is polyphyletic and must be split into five genera. Proposal 1584 would retypify Acacia : the type of the Australian taxon A. penninervis would be conserved over the current lectotype ( A. scorpioides ) of an African taxon. We disagree with the recommendation of the Spermatophyte Committee to endorse this proposal. Contrary to Article 14.12 of the ICBN, no detailed case against conservation was presented in Proposal 1584. We maintain that there are strong arguments against conservation, such as the large number of countries that would be affected, the economic importance of the extra-Australian species, and the economic burden placed on developing countries. Acceptance of this proposal would also violate the guidelines for conservation which clearly state that the principle of priority should prevail when conservation for one part of the world would create disadvantageous change in another part of the world.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-519
Number of pages7
JournalTaxon
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • leguminosae
  • mimosoideae

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Acacia: the case against moving the type to Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Luckow, M., Colin, H., Chriri, B., Winter, P., Fagg, C., Fortunato, R., ... Wojciechowski, M. F. (2005). Acacia: the case against moving the type to Australia. Taxon, 54(2), 513-519. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065385