A systems-based analysis to rethink the European environmental risk assessment of regulated chemicals using pesticides as a pilot case

Johan Axelman*, Annette Aldrich, Sabine Duquesne, Thomas Backhaus, Stephan Brendel, A. Focks, Sheila Holz, Saskia Knillmann, Silvia Pieper, Emilia Silva, Maria Schmied‐Tobies, Christopher John Topping, E.L. Wipfler, James Williams, José Paulo Sousa

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing body of scientific literature stresses the need to advance current environmental risk assessment (ERA) methodologies and associated regulatory frameworks to better address the landscape-scale and long-term impact of pesticide use on biodiversity and the ecosystem. Moreover, more collaborative and integrative approaches are needed to meet sustainability goals. The One Health approach is increasingly applied by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to support the transition towards safer, healthier and more sustainable food. To this end, EFSA commissioned the development of a roadmap for action to establish a European Partnership for next-generation, systems-based Environmental Risk Assessment (PERA). Here, we summarise the main conclusions and recommendations reported in the 2022 PERA Roadmap. This roadmap highlights that fragmentation of data, knowledge and expertise across regulatory sectors results in suboptimal processes and hinders the implementation of integrative ERA approaches needed to better protect the environment. To advance ERA, we revisited the underlying assumptions of the current ERA paradigm; that chemical risks are generally assessed and managed in isolation with a substance-by-substance, realistic worst-case and tiered approach. We suggest optimising the use of the vast amount of information and expertise available with pesticides as a pilot area. It is recommended to as soon as possible adopt a systems-based approach, i.e. within the current regulatory framework, to spark a step-wise transition towards an ERA framed at a system level of ecological and societal relevance. Tangible systems-based and integrative steps are available. For instance, the rich sources of existing data for prospective and retrospective ERA of pesticides could be used to reality-benchmark existing and new ERA methods. To achieve these goals, collaboration among stakeholders across scientific disciplines and regulatory sectors must be strengthened.
Original languageEnglish
Article number174526
Number of pages9
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume948
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Oct 2024

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Integrating prospective-retrospective assessment
  • Fragmented regulatory areas
  • Landscape-scale risk assessment
  • Long-term environmental impacts
  • Substance-by-substance assessment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A systems-based analysis to rethink the European environmental risk assessment of regulated chemicals using pesticides as a pilot case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this