A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change: In search of transparency, coherence and comparability

A. Delaney, S. Chesterman, T.A. Crane, P.A. Tamas, P.J. Ericksen

Research output: Working paperAcademic

Abstract

Because vulnerability is a conceptual construct rather than a directly observable phenomenon, most vulnerability assessments measure a set of “vulnerability indicators”. In order to identify the core approaches and range of variation in the field, we conducted a systematic literature review on local vulnerability to climate change. The systematic review entailed an identification of frameworks, concepts, and operationalizations and a transparency assessment of their reporting. Three fully defined relevant frameworks of vulnerability were identified: IPCC, Patterns of Smallholder Vulnerability and Vulnerability as Expected Poverty. Comparative analysis found substantial heterogeneity in frameworks, concepts and operationalizations, making it impossible to identify patterns of climate vulnerability indicators and determinants that have robust empirical support. If research measuring farmers’ vulnerability to climate change is to have any comparability, it needs greater conceptual coherence and empirical validity. We recommend a systematic program of testing and validating vulnerability measures before institutionalizing them in programmatic contexts
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCopenhagen, Denmark
PublisherCGIAR
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Publication series

NameCCAFS working paper
No.97

Keywords

  • climatic change
  • literature reviews
  • communication
  • transparency
  • opinions
  • public relations
  • public opinion
  • attitudes
  • social research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review of local vulnerability to climate change: In search of transparency, coherence and comparability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this