A step-wise process of decision-making under uncertainty when implementing environmental policy

A.M. Knights, F. Culhane, S.S. Hussain, K.N. Papadopoulou, G.J. Piet, J. Raakaer, S.I. Rogers, L.A. Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An ecosystem approach forms the basis of many recent environmental policies. The underlying concept states that decision-makers must consider the environmental, social and economic costs and benefits in the course of deciding whether to implement a management action. Decision-making can be undermined by uncertainty. Here, we discuss potential sources of uncertainty and their effect on an ecosystem approach-driven environmental policy, the factors affecting the choice and potential for management actions to achieve their objectives, the challenges associated with setting realistic and achievable targets, and how we can prioritise management of detrimental activities. We also consider how human challenges such as the availability of infrastructure and political will and ways of measuring costs and benefits and Member State interactions could also undermine environmental management. Potential limitations along with areas where further effort may be required to support ecosystem-based management objectives are highlighted and the advantages of a structured step-wise interdisciplinary approach to ecosystem management is shown. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)56-64
JournalEnvironmental Science & Policy
Volume39
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • climate-change
  • north-atlantic
  • change impacts
  • management
  • systems
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystems
  • pressure
  • diversity
  • support

Cite this

Knights, A. M., Culhane, F., Hussain, S. S., Papadopoulou, K. N., Piet, G. J., Raakaer, J., ... Robinson, L. A. (2014). A step-wise process of decision-making under uncertainty when implementing environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 39, 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.010