A mobility constraint model to infer sensor behaviour in forest fire risk monitoring

D.E. Ballari, M. Wachowicz, A.K. Bregt, M.A. Manso-Callejo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) play an important role in forest fire risk monitoring. Various applications are in operation. However, the use of mobile sensors in forest risk monitoring remains largely unexplored. Our research contributes to fill this gap by designing a model which abstracts mobility constraints within different types of contexts for the inference of mobile sensor behaviour. This behaviour is focused on achieving a suitable spatial coverage of the WSN when monitoring forest fire risk. The proposed mobility constraint model makes use of a Bayesian network approach and consists of three components: (1) a context typology describing different contexts in which a WSN monitors a dynamic phenomenon; (2) a context graph encoding probabilistic dependencies among variables of interest; and (3) contextual rules encoding expert knowledge and application requirements needed for the inference of sensor behaviour. As an illustration, the model is used to simulate the behaviour of a mobile WSN to obtain a suitable spatial coverage in low and high fire risk scenarios. It is shown that the implemented Bayesian network within the mobility constraint model can successfully infer behaviour such as sleeping sensors, moving sensors, or deploying more sensors to enhance spatial coverage. Furthermore, the mobility constraint model contributes towards mobile sensing in which the mobile sensor behaviour is driven by constraints on the state of the phenomenon and the sensing system
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-95
JournalComputers, Environment and Urban Systems
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • bayesian network
  • coverage

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A mobility constraint model to infer sensor behaviour in forest fire risk monitoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this