A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms

M. Rutgers, H.J. van Wijnen, A.J. Schouten, C. Mulder, A.M.P. Kuiten, L. Brussaard, A.M. Breure

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecosystem-service indicators and related accounting units are crucial for the development of decision frameworks for sustainable land management systems. With a management concept using ecosystem services, land-use expectations can be linked to quantifiable soil features in a defendable and transparent way. A method to define a set of site-specific ecosystem services and indication system for quantification was set-up and run. First, we interviewed a wide group of land users profiting from ecosystem services of the soil at four arable farms in the polder Hoeksche Waard (S-SE of Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Subsequently, site-specific ecosystem services were defined and weighted according to land use expectations at different spatial and temporal scales. Second, a practical set of indicators was taken from 'Best Professional Judgment' and used to quantify the performance of the ecosystem services for these four farms. The indicators were derived from biotic and abiotic soil parameters. The performance of ecosystem services was related to a reference situation (MEP: maximum ecological potential) with the same land use and soil type combination (i.e., arable fields on silt loam) taken from the database of our national soil survey. In many cases, the performance of ecosystem services was relatively poor if compared to MEP. However, the performances of natural attenuation and/or climate-related services were better. In addition, the different management of these farms (i.e. conventional, intensive and organic farming) was reflected in the performance of the ecosystem services of their soils. Third, land management measures to improve the targeted ecosystem services were incorporated in the outlined method, but not worked out with illustrative field data in this study. Together with concordant data, we show opportunities for a quantification of ecosystem services to improve land-users' awareness and to assess management sustainability. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-48
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume415
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

ecosystem service
Ecosystems
Farms
stakeholder
farm
Soils
soil
Land use
land use
land management
attribute
method
Soil surveys
Natural attenuation
organic farming
natural attenuation
Silt
soil survey
loam
soil type

Keywords

  • classification
  • provision
  • land

Cite this

Rutgers, M. ; van Wijnen, H.J. ; Schouten, A.J. ; Mulder, C. ; Kuiten, A.M.P. ; Brussaard, L. ; Breure, A.M. / A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms. In: Science of the Total Environment. 2012 ; Vol. 415. pp. 39-48.
@article{75f5e2e8104b447f97e5f60367b11c6d,
title = "A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms",
abstract = "Ecosystem-service indicators and related accounting units are crucial for the development of decision frameworks for sustainable land management systems. With a management concept using ecosystem services, land-use expectations can be linked to quantifiable soil features in a defendable and transparent way. A method to define a set of site-specific ecosystem services and indication system for quantification was set-up and run. First, we interviewed a wide group of land users profiting from ecosystem services of the soil at four arable farms in the polder Hoeksche Waard (S-SE of Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Subsequently, site-specific ecosystem services were defined and weighted according to land use expectations at different spatial and temporal scales. Second, a practical set of indicators was taken from 'Best Professional Judgment' and used to quantify the performance of the ecosystem services for these four farms. The indicators were derived from biotic and abiotic soil parameters. The performance of ecosystem services was related to a reference situation (MEP: maximum ecological potential) with the same land use and soil type combination (i.e., arable fields on silt loam) taken from the database of our national soil survey. In many cases, the performance of ecosystem services was relatively poor if compared to MEP. However, the performances of natural attenuation and/or climate-related services were better. In addition, the different management of these farms (i.e. conventional, intensive and organic farming) was reflected in the performance of the ecosystem services of their soils. Third, land management measures to improve the targeted ecosystem services were incorporated in the outlined method, but not worked out with illustrative field data in this study. Together with concordant data, we show opportunities for a quantification of ecosystem services to improve land-users' awareness and to assess management sustainability. {\circledC} 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "classification, provision, land",
author = "M. Rutgers and {van Wijnen}, H.J. and A.J. Schouten and C. Mulder and A.M.P. Kuiten and L. Brussaard and A.M. Breure",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.041",
language = "English",
volume = "415",
pages = "39--48",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms. / Rutgers, M.; van Wijnen, H.J.; Schouten, A.J.; Mulder, C.; Kuiten, A.M.P.; Brussaard, L.; Breure, A.M.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 415, 2012, p. 39-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms

AU - Rutgers, M.

AU - van Wijnen, H.J.

AU - Schouten, A.J.

AU - Mulder, C.

AU - Kuiten, A.M.P.

AU - Brussaard, L.

AU - Breure, A.M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Ecosystem-service indicators and related accounting units are crucial for the development of decision frameworks for sustainable land management systems. With a management concept using ecosystem services, land-use expectations can be linked to quantifiable soil features in a defendable and transparent way. A method to define a set of site-specific ecosystem services and indication system for quantification was set-up and run. First, we interviewed a wide group of land users profiting from ecosystem services of the soil at four arable farms in the polder Hoeksche Waard (S-SE of Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Subsequently, site-specific ecosystem services were defined and weighted according to land use expectations at different spatial and temporal scales. Second, a practical set of indicators was taken from 'Best Professional Judgment' and used to quantify the performance of the ecosystem services for these four farms. The indicators were derived from biotic and abiotic soil parameters. The performance of ecosystem services was related to a reference situation (MEP: maximum ecological potential) with the same land use and soil type combination (i.e., arable fields on silt loam) taken from the database of our national soil survey. In many cases, the performance of ecosystem services was relatively poor if compared to MEP. However, the performances of natural attenuation and/or climate-related services were better. In addition, the different management of these farms (i.e. conventional, intensive and organic farming) was reflected in the performance of the ecosystem services of their soils. Third, land management measures to improve the targeted ecosystem services were incorporated in the outlined method, but not worked out with illustrative field data in this study. Together with concordant data, we show opportunities for a quantification of ecosystem services to improve land-users' awareness and to assess management sustainability. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Ecosystem-service indicators and related accounting units are crucial for the development of decision frameworks for sustainable land management systems. With a management concept using ecosystem services, land-use expectations can be linked to quantifiable soil features in a defendable and transparent way. A method to define a set of site-specific ecosystem services and indication system for quantification was set-up and run. First, we interviewed a wide group of land users profiting from ecosystem services of the soil at four arable farms in the polder Hoeksche Waard (S-SE of Rotterdam, the Netherlands). Subsequently, site-specific ecosystem services were defined and weighted according to land use expectations at different spatial and temporal scales. Second, a practical set of indicators was taken from 'Best Professional Judgment' and used to quantify the performance of the ecosystem services for these four farms. The indicators were derived from biotic and abiotic soil parameters. The performance of ecosystem services was related to a reference situation (MEP: maximum ecological potential) with the same land use and soil type combination (i.e., arable fields on silt loam) taken from the database of our national soil survey. In many cases, the performance of ecosystem services was relatively poor if compared to MEP. However, the performances of natural attenuation and/or climate-related services were better. In addition, the different management of these farms (i.e. conventional, intensive and organic farming) was reflected in the performance of the ecosystem services of their soils. Third, land management measures to improve the targeted ecosystem services were incorporated in the outlined method, but not worked out with illustrative field data in this study. Together with concordant data, we show opportunities for a quantification of ecosystem services to improve land-users' awareness and to assess management sustainability. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - classification

KW - provision

KW - land

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.041

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.041

M3 - Article

VL - 415

SP - 39

EP - 48

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -