A global assessment of glyphosate and AMPA inputs into rivers: Over half of the pollutants are from corn and soybean production

Qi Zhang*, Yanan Li, Carolien Kroeze, Wen Xu, Lingtong Gai, Miltiadis Vitsas, Lin Ma, Fusuo Zhang, Maryna Strokal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Glyphosate is widely used in agriculture for weed control; however, it may pollute water systems with its by-product, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA). Therefore, a better understanding of the flows of glyphosate and AMPA from soils into rivers is required. We developed the spatially explicit MARINA–Pesticides model to estimate the annual inputs of glyphosate and AMPA into rivers, considering 10 crops in 10,226 sub-basins globally for 2020. Our model results show that, globally, 880 tonnes of glyphosate and 4,090 tonnes of AMPA entered rivers. This implies that 82 % of the river inputs were from AMPA, with glyphosate accounting for the remainder. Over half of AMPA and glyphosate in rivers globally originated from corn and soybean production; however, there were differences among sub-basins. Asian sub-basins accounted for over half of glyphosate in rivers globally, with the contribution from corn production being dominant. South American sub-basins accounted for approximately two-thirds of AMPA in rivers globally, originating largely from soybean production. Our findings constitute a reference for implementing and supporting effective control strategies to achieve Sustainable Development Goals 2 and 6 (food production and clean water, respectively) simultaneously in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Article number121986
JournalWater Research
Volume261
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • AMPA
  • Crops
  • Glyphosate
  • MARINA–Pesticides model
  • Sub-basin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A global assessment of glyphosate and AMPA inputs into rivers: Over half of the pollutants are from corn and soybean production'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this