A critical review of the Ganges Water Sharing arrangement

Kazi Saidur Rahman*, Zahidul Islam, Umme Kulsum Navera, Fulco Ludwig

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 1996 Ganges Water Sharing Treaty was an important breakthrough in solving disputes over sharing Ganges water between India and Bangladesh. This study evaluates cooperation reflected in the Treaty by performing a quantitative analysis on available water sharing data. The study recognized that inaccurate projection of future flow and the obligation of allocating guaranteed 991 m 3 /s flows perpetuate the ongoing water sharing conflicts. The provision of guaranteed minimal flow alternately to India and Bangladesh during critical periods leads to frequent occurrences of low-flow events. Results indicated that the Treaty underestimated the impact of climate variability and possibly increasing upstream water abstraction. Statistical analysis of the post-Treaty data (1997–2016) also indicated that 65% of the time Bangladesh did not receive its guaranteed share during critical dry periods with high water demand. It is advised to project the reliable water availability using a combination of modelling and improved observation of river flows. In addition, the condition of minimum guaranteed share should be removed to reduce the frequency of low-flow events in future. Although our analyses show a number of weaknesses, the Treaty could still enhance the future regional cooperation if some adjustments are made to the current terms and conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-276
Number of pages18
JournalWater Policy
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • Farakka Barrage
  • Ganges Water Sharing Treaty
  • Regional cooperation
  • Transboundary rivers
  • Water conflicts

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical review of the Ganges Water Sharing arrangement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this