A comparison of supervised, unsupervised and synthetic land use classification methods in the north of Iran

M. Mohammady, H.R. Moradi, H. Zeinivand, A.J.A.M. Temme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Land use classification is often the first step in land use studies and thus forms the basis for many earth science studies. In this paper, we focus on low-cost techniques for combining Landsat images with geographic information system approaches to create a land use map. In the Golestan region of Iran, we show that traditional supervised and unsupervised methods do not result in sufficiently accurate land use maps. Therefore, we evaluated a synthetic approach combining supervised and unsupervised methods with decision rules based on easily accessible ancillary data. For accuracy assessment, confusion matrices and kappa coefficients were calculated for the maps created with the supervised, unsupervised and synthetic approaches. Overall accuracy of the synthetic approach was 98.2 %, which is over the 85 % level that is considered satisfactory for planning and management purposes. This shows that integration of remote sensing data, ancillary data and decision rules provides better classification accuracy than traditional methods, without significant additional use of resources
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1515-1526
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of supervised, unsupervised and synthetic land use classification methods in the north of Iran'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this