A Comparative Analysis of Yield Gaps and Water Productivity on Smallholder Farms in Ethiopia, South Africa and Tunisia

Nebo Jovanovic*, Constansia Musvoto, Willem De Clercq, Cou Pienaar, Brilliant Petja, Abdelaziz Zairi, Salia Hanafi, Tarek Ajmi, Jean Claude Mailhol, Bruno Cheviron, Rami Albasha, Solomon Habtu, Eyasu Yazew, Muluberhan Kifle, Degol Fissahaye, Gebremeskel Aregay, Kiros Habtegebreal, Abreha Gebrekiros, Yirga Woldu, Jochen Froebrich

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Agriculture in developing countries will have to transform and increase production by an estimated 70% in order to meet demands by 2050. Although well-managed commercial farms offer little manoeuvring space for increasing agricultural water productivity, smallholder farms usually operate at low input costs and therefore provide ample opportunities to reduce the potential yield gap through agricultural intensification. The aim of this paper is to analyse and compare yields and water productivities obtained in field and modelling experiments in Ethiopia (maize, garlic, onion), South Africa (tomato) and Tunisia (tomato, potato, wheat). Innovative agricultural practices were introduced on smallholder farms: irrigation scheduling and NPS Zn fertilization in Ethiopia; high-yielding cultivar, drip irrigation, mulching and organic amendments in South Africa; and crop water modelling in Tunisia. In general, crop yields increased up to eight times with innovative practices compared to current conventional farming practices. Crop water productivities were fairly stable within the same experiments, but increased with innovations, indicating that intensive farming can be more environmentally sustainable than conventional farming. Intensive farming systems in a resource-rich environment (high radiation levels, relatively fertile, deep and well-drained soils), combined with technology transfer and capacity building could be seen as viable strategies to secure food for smallholders and communities in African rural areas, as well as to improve water utilization in water-scarce catchments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-87
JournalIrrigation and Drainage
Volume69
Issue numberS1
Early online date1 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Amendements organiques
  • Fertilization management
  • Gestion de la fertilisation
  • Irrigation scheduling
  • Modèle PILOTE
  • Mulching
  • Organic amendments
  • Paillis
  • PILOTE model
  • Planification de l'irrigation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparative Analysis of Yield Gaps and Water Productivity on Smallholder Farms in Ethiopia, South Africa and Tunisia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Jovanovic, N., Musvoto, C., De Clercq, W., Pienaar, C., Petja, B., Zairi, A., Hanafi, S., Ajmi, T., Mailhol, J. C., Cheviron, B., Albasha, R., Habtu, S., Yazew, E., Kifle, M., Fissahaye, D., Aregay, G., Habtegebreal, K., Gebrekiros, A., Woldu, Y., & Froebrich, J. (2020). A Comparative Analysis of Yield Gaps and Water Productivity on Smallholder Farms in Ethiopia, South Africa and Tunisia. Irrigation and Drainage, 69(S1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2238