A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions

B. Pandeya, W. Buytaert, Z. Zulkafli, T. Karpouzoglou, F. Mao, D.M. Hannah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite significant advances in the development of the ecosystem services concept across the science and policy arenas, the valuation of ecosystem services to guide sustainable development remains challenging, especially at a local scale and in data scarce regions. In this paper, we review and compare major past and current valuation approaches and discuss their key strengths and weaknesses for guiding policy decisions. To deal with the complexity of methods used in different valuation approaches, our review uses multiple entry points: data vs simulation, habitat vs system vs place-based, specific vs entire portfolio, local vs regional scale, and monetary vs non-monetary. We find that although most valuation approaches are useful to explain ecosystem services at a macro/system level, an application of locally relevant valuation approaches, which allows for a more integrated valuation relevant to decision making is still hindered by data-scarcity. The advent of spatially explicit policy support systems shows particular promise to make the best use of available data and simulations. Data collection remains crucial for the local scale and in data scarce regions. Leveraging citizen science-based data and knowledge co-generation may support the integrated valuation, while at the same time making the valuation process more inclusive, replicable and policy-oriented.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)250-259
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

valuation
ecosystem service
ecosystem services
Ecosystem
support systems
Conservation of Natural Resources
sustainable development
decision making
Decision Making
simulation
science
cogeneration
habitat
analysis
multiple use
habitats
citizen
policy
methodology

Cite this

Pandeya, B. ; Buytaert, W. ; Zulkafli, Z. ; Karpouzoglou, T. ; Mao, F. ; Hannah, D.M. / A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. In: Ecosystem Services. 2016 ; Vol. 22. pp. 250-259.
@article{accd92f25c6f4ea18571b9a45af597e1,
title = "A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions",
abstract = "Despite significant advances in the development of the ecosystem services concept across the science and policy arenas, the valuation of ecosystem services to guide sustainable development remains challenging, especially at a local scale and in data scarce regions. In this paper, we review and compare major past and current valuation approaches and discuss their key strengths and weaknesses for guiding policy decisions. To deal with the complexity of methods used in different valuation approaches, our review uses multiple entry points: data vs simulation, habitat vs system vs place-based, specific vs entire portfolio, local vs regional scale, and monetary vs non-monetary. We find that although most valuation approaches are useful to explain ecosystem services at a macro/system level, an application of locally relevant valuation approaches, which allows for a more integrated valuation relevant to decision making is still hindered by data-scarcity. The advent of spatially explicit policy support systems shows particular promise to make the best use of available data and simulations. Data collection remains crucial for the local scale and in data scarce regions. Leveraging citizen science-based data and knowledge co-generation may support the integrated valuation, while at the same time making the valuation process more inclusive, replicable and policy-oriented.",
author = "B. Pandeya and W. Buytaert and Z. Zulkafli and T. Karpouzoglou and F. Mao and D.M. Hannah",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "250--259",
journal = "Ecosystem Services",
issn = "2212-0416",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions. / Pandeya, B.; Buytaert, W.; Zulkafli, Z.; Karpouzoglou, T.; Mao, F.; Hannah, D.M.

In: Ecosystem Services, Vol. 22, 2016, p. 250-259.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative analysis of ecosystem services valuation approaches for application at the local scale and in data scarce regions

AU - Pandeya, B.

AU - Buytaert, W.

AU - Zulkafli, Z.

AU - Karpouzoglou, T.

AU - Mao, F.

AU - Hannah, D.M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Despite significant advances in the development of the ecosystem services concept across the science and policy arenas, the valuation of ecosystem services to guide sustainable development remains challenging, especially at a local scale and in data scarce regions. In this paper, we review and compare major past and current valuation approaches and discuss their key strengths and weaknesses for guiding policy decisions. To deal with the complexity of methods used in different valuation approaches, our review uses multiple entry points: data vs simulation, habitat vs system vs place-based, specific vs entire portfolio, local vs regional scale, and monetary vs non-monetary. We find that although most valuation approaches are useful to explain ecosystem services at a macro/system level, an application of locally relevant valuation approaches, which allows for a more integrated valuation relevant to decision making is still hindered by data-scarcity. The advent of spatially explicit policy support systems shows particular promise to make the best use of available data and simulations. Data collection remains crucial for the local scale and in data scarce regions. Leveraging citizen science-based data and knowledge co-generation may support the integrated valuation, while at the same time making the valuation process more inclusive, replicable and policy-oriented.

AB - Despite significant advances in the development of the ecosystem services concept across the science and policy arenas, the valuation of ecosystem services to guide sustainable development remains challenging, especially at a local scale and in data scarce regions. In this paper, we review and compare major past and current valuation approaches and discuss their key strengths and weaknesses for guiding policy decisions. To deal with the complexity of methods used in different valuation approaches, our review uses multiple entry points: data vs simulation, habitat vs system vs place-based, specific vs entire portfolio, local vs regional scale, and monetary vs non-monetary. We find that although most valuation approaches are useful to explain ecosystem services at a macro/system level, an application of locally relevant valuation approaches, which allows for a more integrated valuation relevant to decision making is still hindered by data-scarcity. The advent of spatially explicit policy support systems shows particular promise to make the best use of available data and simulations. Data collection remains crucial for the local scale and in data scarce regions. Leveraging citizen science-based data and knowledge co-generation may support the integrated valuation, while at the same time making the valuation process more inclusive, replicable and policy-oriented.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.015

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 250

EP - 259

JO - Ecosystem Services

JF - Ecosystem Services

SN - 2212-0416

ER -